2010
DOI: 10.1586/erm.10.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular diagnostics and genotyping of MRSA: an update

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The introduction of these modern technologies in the microbiological laboratories is still slow, because of the traditionally well-established conventional identification methods. However, many traditional methods require days to properly identify certain pathogens, whereas modern molecular methods, in addition to being much faster, display also an improved sensitivity and specificity (te Witt et al, 2010). For the fast and specific detection of pathogens directly from sample material, a specific PCR assay is the state-of-the-art method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of these modern technologies in the microbiological laboratories is still slow, because of the traditionally well-established conventional identification methods. However, many traditional methods require days to properly identify certain pathogens, whereas modern molecular methods, in addition to being much faster, display also an improved sensitivity and specificity (te Witt et al, 2010). For the fast and specific detection of pathogens directly from sample material, a specific PCR assay is the state-of-the-art method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last few years, various in-house and commercialized NATs have been introduced for the detection of MRSA [42], with clear benefits over non-NATs, in particular, a reduced time to identification and an improved sensitivity and specificity. Real-time PCR tests targeting S. aureus specific genes such as nuc, spa or fem in combination with the mec genes are considered as the 'gold standards' for MRSA confirmation.…”
Section: Nucleic-acid Based Detection Of Mrsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-time PCR tests targeting S. aureus specific genes such as nuc, spa or fem in combination with the mec genes are considered as the 'gold standards' for MRSA confirmation. To date, several in-house tests and commercialized assays, utilizing this detection strategy, have been described in the literature (Table 1) [42][43][44][45][46]. One such test was described recently by Pasanen et al [43].…”
Section: Nucleic-acid Based Detection Of Mrsamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This complexity hampers our understanding of the pathophysiology of S. aureus infection, and it interferes with the development of adequate diagnostic tools and effective (passive) vaccines. A broad variety of diagnostic tools is available 20, but their optimal use in the diagnostic and therapeutic or prophylactic process is still rarely reported 21. However, decolonization strategies do prevent auto‐infection to a large extent and, even in the absence of vaccines, this may be a useful strategy to prevent infection 21.…”
Section: Portrait Of a “Superbug”mentioning
confidence: 99%