Species-specific identification of campylobacters is problematic, primarily due to the absence of suitable biochemical assays and the existence of atypical strains. 16S rRNA gene (16S rDNA)-based identification of bacteria offers a possible alternative when phenotypic tests fail. Therefore, we evaluated the reliability of 16S rDNA sequencing for the species-specific identification of campylobacters. Sequence analyses were performed by using almost 94% of the complete 16S rRNA genes of 135 phenotypically characterized Campylobacter strains, including all known taxa of this genus. It was shown that 16S rDNA analysis enables specific identification of most Campylobacter species. The exception was a lack of discrimination among the taxa Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli and atypical C. lari strains, which shared identical or nearly identical 16S rDNA sequences. Subsequently, it was investigated whether partial 16S rDNA sequences are sufficient to determine species identity. Sequence alignments led to the identification of four 16S rDNA regions with high degrees of interspecies variation but with highly conserved sequence patterns within the respective species. A simple protocol based on the analysis of these sequence patterns was developed, which enabled the unambiguous identification of the majority of Campylobacter species. We recommend 16S rDNA sequence analysis as an effective, rapid procedure for the specific identification of campylobacters.Campylobacter species are important pathogens that cause a variety of diseases in humans and animals (26, 43). The most prominent members of these proteobacteria are the species Campylobacter coli and C. jejuni, the latter of which is considered the most common cause of acute bacterial enteritis worldwide (3). To date, the genus Campylobacter comprises 16 species, and among them several species other than C. jejuni and C. coli are becoming increasingly recognized as significant human pathogens (26). However, recovery and identification of these species require specialized preparatory procedures for specimens, such as filtration steps and selective incubation methods (e.g., the use of a hydrogen-enriched atmosphere) (26). Since most routine laboratories do not use these techniques, infections caused by these taxa are likely to be underdiagnosed (13,27). In addition, phenotypic tests have only a limited discriminatory potential for the distinctive identification of Campylobacter species. These pathogens are slowly growing, fastidious organisms and are considered biochemically unreactive. As a result, extensive identification schemes comprising up to 67 phenotypic features are used to correctly identify the entire spectrum of campylobacteria (40). Moreover, the phenotypic tests used in most routine laboratories lack standardization, although it is known that even minor parameters such as the inoculum size affect the results (39). The existence of biochemically atypical strains, which exhibit unusual phenotypic profiles, represents an additional challenge (36). In these cases no...