Molecular Dockings and Molecular Dynamics Simulations Reveal the Potency of Different Inhibitors against Xanthine Oxidase

Abstract

Xanthine oxidase (XO), which can catalyze the formation of xanthine or hypoxanthine to uric acid, is the most important target of gout. To explore the conformational changes for inhibitor binding, molecular dockings and molecular dynamics simulations were performed. Docking results indicated that three inhibitors had similar pose binding to XO. Molecular dynamics simulations showed that the binding of three inhibitors influenced the secondary structure changes in XO. After binding to the inhibitor, the peptide Phe798-Leu814 formed different degrees of unhelix, while for the peptide Glu1065-Ser1075, only a partial helix region was formed when allopurinol was bound. Through the protein structure analysis in the simulation process, we found that the distance between the active residues Arg880 and Thr1010 was reduced and the distance between Glu802 and Thr1010 was increased after the addition of inhibitors. The above simulation results showed the similarities and differences of the interaction between the three inhibitors binding to the protein. MM-PBSA calculations suggested that, among three inhibitors, allopurinol had the best binding effect with XO followed by daidzin and puerarin. This finding was consistent with previous experimental data. Our results can provide some useful clues for further gout treatment research.

Characterizing the ligand-binding affinity toward SARS-CoV-2 Mproviaphysics- and knowledge-based approaches

“…38,39 The docking affinity is used to rank the ligand, 40 while the docking pose can be used as an initial conformation for further calculation using MD simulations. 41,42 Moreover, molecular docking simulations have also been utilized to interpret the experimental data, especially when the experimental structures were not available. 43 Among these simulations, noncovalent binding docking protocols are performed to screen the ligand-binding affinity of ca.…”

Virtual Screening–Molecular Docking–Activity Evaluation of Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle Bark in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

“…It is generally believed that when the absolute value is greater than 7 kcal/mol, the possibility of the combination of the compound and the protein is high [33]. The larger the absolute value of the binding constant, the lower the free energy required for the compound to bind [34]. The compound with the highest function score can be selected in order to construct a compound-protein binding diagram, which can visually convey the binding mode of the active compound with human IL-1R, TLR, EGFR, TGFR, and Wnt proteins and the interaction with the surrounding amino acid residues.…”

A multiscale screening strategy for the identification of novel xanthine oxidase inhibitors based on the pharmacological features of febuxostat analogues

“…8a) were calculated to quantitatively estimate protein compactness and conformational transition. 12 Normally, high Rg values mean that the protein conformation may incline to open the binding pocket to facilitate interactions with inhibitors. 44 It was observed that the Rg results of all systems fluctuated from B3.15 nm to B3.20 nm during the whole simulations.…”

“…The current anti-HUA treatment strategy aims to reduce SUA though medication and lifestyle adjustments, such as a healthy diet, moderate exercise, and quitting smoking and alcohol. 5,11,12 There are two common drug strategies for HUA clinical treatments: inhibiting UA production and facilitating UA excretion. 2,13 However, some studies have shown that the SUA-lowering ability of uricosuric drugs through accelerating UA excretion is not ideal.…”