2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2006.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics and circular dichroism studies of human and rat C-peptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1B). Ca 2+ was also observed to have some effect on oligomer distribution, with the most significant effect being a decrease in medium-order oligomers (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). In conclusion, divalent ions were seen to affect C-peptide oligomer formation.…”
Section: C-peptide Forms Oligomersmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1B). Ca 2+ was also observed to have some effect on oligomer distribution, with the most significant effect being a decrease in medium-order oligomers (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). In conclusion, divalent ions were seen to affect C-peptide oligomer formation.…”
Section: C-peptide Forms Oligomersmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Similar to many peptides, however, it has a propensity to form a a-helical structure in the presence of trifluoroethanol [15]. In addition, molecular dynamics simulations propose turn-like motifs in the midregion and in the C-terminal region [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Driven by the possibility to understand C-peptide bioactivities, investigations were launched into the structural features of C-peptide, both as a part of proinsulin and as a free peptide in solution. Computational studies suggested a flexible architecture, potentially with a turn motif around residues 15-20 [37]. Solution NMR then provided the first high-resolution structure, confirming that C-peptide lacks a well-defined fold but exhibits some helical propensity in the C-terminal pentapeptide (Fig.…”
Section: Phase 3: Combined Knowledge Of Structure Function and Evolumentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Apart from mature insulin, whose three dimensional structure was determined by X‐ray crystallography, proinsulin and C‐peptide adopt unordered structures in solution, as NMR spectroscopy confirmed and, interestingly, free insulin (chains A and B) displays similar overall conformation to that of proinsulin . Although most researchers agree that the C‐peptide structure is unordered under physiological conditions, a few studies reveal that C‐peptide is not a random coil, but rather contains detectable ordered structure both when free or attached to insulin in proinsulin; the N‐terminal part ( 1‐ EAEDLQVGQVE −11 ) may adopt an α‐helical conformation at high concentrations of trifluoroethanol (TFE) and Molecular Dynamics simulations suggest turn‐like motifs in the middle part and the C‐terminal of C‐peptide …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C‐terminal region contains an interaction epitope for binding to a G‐protein coupled receptor, while the C‐terminal pentapeptide 27‐ EGSLQ −31 specifically, simulates the way the full‐length C‐peptide binds to a cell surface . The middle segment (residues 12 − 26) of proinsulin C‐peptide, with a high turn propensity, is considered to be flexible due to its sequence composition and it is suggested to mediate C‐peptide – membrane interactions at low pH …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%