2010
DOI: 10.1080/10910344.2010.512852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Nanometric Cutting

Abstract: Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations of nanometric cutting of single-crystal copper were conducted to predict cutting forces and investigate the mechanism of chip formation at the nano-level. The MD simulations were conducted at a conventional cutting speed of 5 m/s and different depths of cut (0.724-2.172 nm), and cutting forces and shear angle were predicted. The effect of tool rake angles and depths of cut on the mechanism of chip formation was investigated. Tools with different rake angles, namely 0 • , 5 •… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Figure 6 , it can be seen that both F y and F z values increase as rake angle values increase in magnitude and eventually, F z values become greater than F y values. The increasing trend for both force components is consistent with every relevant work in the literature [ 10 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. Moreover, a slower increase is attested for F y than for F z , as F z values increase 2.62 times, whereas F y values increase only 1.14 times, as it was also observed in several works, such as [ 38 , 39 , 43 , 48 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From Figure 6 , it can be seen that both F y and F z values increase as rake angle values increase in magnitude and eventually, F z values become greater than F y values. The increasing trend for both force components is consistent with every relevant work in the literature [ 10 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. Moreover, a slower increase is attested for F y than for F z , as F z values increase 2.62 times, whereas F y values increase only 1.14 times, as it was also observed in several works, such as [ 38 , 39 , 43 , 48 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this set of simulations, the effect of abrasive grain rake angle is investigated for negative values starting from −5° to −60°. Although no similar works regarding the rake angle of abrasive grains are reported, this range of values was selected in accordance with the relevant literature on nanocutting simulations with negative rake angle tools [ 10 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. More specifically, most authors have chosen negative rake angle values up to −45° [ 34 , 43 , 45 ] or −60° [ 10 , 35 , 38 ], and Lai et al [ 37 ] pointed out that the critical rake angle for formation of chip is −65°, as they proved that higher negative rake angles resulted in plastic deformation of the substrate without a pileup of atoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to previous simulations which have taken the cutting tool to be a rigid body, a reasonable assumption if the focus of interest is the mechanism of nanometric cutting rather than the tool wear. [41][42][43] The model developed in this work is based on the boundary condition of bottom and closed cut out side which was found more appropriate to study nanometric cutting process. 44 Also, the MD model incorporates a negative tool rake angle, as this is generally recommended for machining brittle materials.…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the single-crystal silicon workpiece and the diamond cutting tool were modelled as deformable bodies in order to study the tribological interactions between the two. This is in contrast to previous simulations which have assumed the cutting tool to be a rigid body, a reasonable assumption if the focus of interest is the mechanism of nanometric cutting rather than the tool wear [17,26,27]. In the simulation model shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 91%