2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular dynamics studies on the strengthening mechanism of Al matrix composites reinforced by grapnene nanoplatelets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Young's modulus of pure Al was determined to be 61.43 GPa using compression simulation, which is in close agreement with the experimentally published values of 60.2-76.1 GPa [36][37][38]. In addition, it is in reasonable agreement with the simulation results that reported a Young's modulus of 64.4-74.8 GPa [11,19,39]. In the present study, yield stress and strain were obtained as 5.9 GPa and 0.1, respectively, which are also comparable to the published values of 6 GPa and 0.11 of yield stress and strain, respectively [19].…”
Section: Validation Of Simulation Proceduressupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The Young's modulus of pure Al was determined to be 61.43 GPa using compression simulation, which is in close agreement with the experimentally published values of 60.2-76.1 GPa [36][37][38]. In addition, it is in reasonable agreement with the simulation results that reported a Young's modulus of 64.4-74.8 GPa [11,19,39]. In the present study, yield stress and strain were obtained as 5.9 GPa and 0.1, respectively, which are also comparable to the published values of 6 GPa and 0.11 of yield stress and strain, respectively [19].…”
Section: Validation Of Simulation Proceduressupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This observation is in line with the results reported in literature. 43 To validate the MD procedure employed in the present study to evaluate the tensile and shear moduli of GS-reinforced Al nanocomposite, the obtained elastic modulus for pure Al is compared with the result reported by Rong et al 36 Along with pure Al, the tensile elastic modulus of GS-reinforced Al nanocomposite is also predicted by the approach developed by Srivastava and Kumar 13 using the finite element method (FEM). The FEM-based three-phase model utilized to predict the tensile modulus of nanocomposite is shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To validate the MD procedure employed in the present study to evaluate the tensile and shear moduli of GS-reinforced Al nanocomposite, the obtained elastic modulus for pure Al is compared with the result reported by Rong et al. 36 Along with pure Al, the tensile elastic modulus of GS-reinforced Al nanocomposite is also predicted by the approach developed by Srivastava and Kumar 13 using the finite element method (FEM). The FEM-based three-phase model utilized to predict the tensile modulus of nanocomposite is shown in Figure 8
Figure 8. Continuum mechanics-based three-phase model to study the effect of interphase on the elastic properties of GS-reinforced Al nanocomposite proposed by Srivastava and Kumar 13 ( v f = 12.9%).
.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Also, Rong et al. 21 used MD simulation to study the strengthening effect of nameplates on aluminum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%