Three algorithms, namely a Replica Exchange method (REM), a Replica Exchange Multicanonical method (REMUCA), and Replica Exchange Multicanonical with Replica Exchange (REMUCAREM), were implemented with the coarse-grained united-residue force field (UNRES) in both Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics versions. The MD algorithms use the constanttemperature Berendsen thermostat, with the velocity Verlet algorithm and variable time step. The algorithms were applied to one peptide (20 residues of Alanine with free ends; ala 20 ) and two small proteins, namely an α-helical protein of 46 residues (the B-domain of the staphylococal protein A; 1BDD), and an α+β-protein of 48 residues (the E. Coli Mltd Lysm Domain; 1E0G). Calculated thermodynamic averages, such as canonical average energy and heat capacity, are in good agreement among all simulations for poly-L-alanine, showing that the algorithms were implemented correctly, and that all three algorithms are equally effective for small systems. For protein A, all algorithms performed reasonably well, although some variability in the calculated results was observed whereas, for a more complicated α+β-protein (1E0G), only Replica Exchange was capable of producing reliable statistics for calculating thermodynamic quantities. Finally, from the Replica Exchange molecular dynamics results, we calculated free energy maps as functions of RMSD and radius of gyration for different temperatures. The free energy calculations show correct folding behavior for poly-L-alanine and protein A while, for 1E0G, the native structure had the lowest free energy only at very low temperatures. Hence, the entropy contribution for 1E0G is larger than that for protein A at the same temperature. A larger contribution from entropy means that there are more accessible conformations at a given temperature, making it more difficult to obtain an efficient coverage of conformational space to obtain reliable thermodynamic properties. At the same temperature, ala 20 has the smallest entropy contribution, followed by protein A, and then by 1E0G.
IntroductionEfficient sampling algorithms have been an essential component of methods for studying protein structure and dynamics in structural biology and theoretical chemistry. A variety of sampling algorithms have been used in our laboratory and, depending on whether the goal is global optimization or folding simulations, they can be be categorized in the following way.For successful prediction of the three-dimensional structure of a protein (based solely on its amino acid sequence), several classes of algorithms have been used. The first class includes modifications of the Metropolis Monte Carlo procedure, 1,2 such as Monte Carlo-withMinimization (MCM), 3,4 electrostaticallydriven Monte Carlo (EDMC), 5,6 Conformational Corresponding author: Professor H.A. Scheraga, Tel: (607) 255-4034; fax: (607) 254-4700; e-mail: has5@cornell.edu.
NIH Public Access
NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript
NIH-PA Author ManuscriptFamily Monte Carlo (CFMC), 7 and ...