2002
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.40.9.3313-3318.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Epidemiology of Erythromycin Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates from Blood and Noninvasive Sites

Abstract: Erythromycin-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from blood cultures and noninvasive sites were studied over a 3-year period. The prevalence of erythromycin resistance was 11.9% (19 of 160) in blood culture isolates but 4.2% (60 of 1,435) in noninvasive-site isolates. Sixty-two of the 79 resistant isolates were available for study. The M phenotype was responsible for 76% (47 of 62) of resistance, largely due to a serotype 14 clone, characterized by multilocus sequence typing as ST9, which accounted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
64
4
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
64
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon may occur because erm(B) and mef(A) are associated with different conjugative transposons (Tn1545 and Tn916, respectively) (25,34,36). It is possible that the insertion of erm(B) into transposon Tn1545 already associated with tet(M) and other resistance genes has evolved over a long time period, whereas the association of mef(A) and tet(M) on Tn916 has occurred more recently (1,25,35). It will be interesting to see if any further evolutionary changes are observed as the PROTEKT US surveillance study continues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon may occur because erm(B) and mef(A) are associated with different conjugative transposons (Tn1545 and Tn916, respectively) (25,34,36). It is possible that the insertion of erm(B) into transposon Tn1545 already associated with tet(M) and other resistance genes has evolved over a long time period, whereas the association of mef(A) and tet(M) on Tn916 has occurred more recently (1,25,35). It will be interesting to see if any further evolutionary changes are observed as the PROTEKT US surveillance study continues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of tet(M), msr(A), Tn1207.1, and mega was done as previously described (1). Discrimination between mef(A) and mef(A) subclass mef(E) was performed by amplifying a segment of the mef(A) gene and then comparing the sequence to the sequences with GenBank accession numbers U70055 [mef(A)] and U83667 [mef(A) subclass mef(E)].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ST9 clone has been identified as an important cause of meningitis throughout the United Kingdom (19) and is recognized as a cause of invasive disease in several other countries (http://www.mlst .net). Dissemination of invasive ST9 isolates has also been reported for Canada, Scotland, and, most recently, Greece (2,17,18). The mechanisms behind the impressive global spread of England 14 -9 remain unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%