2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1702(02)00260-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular epidemiology of foot-and-mouth disease virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
561
3
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 617 publications
(581 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
12
561
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences exist in the selection forces shaping the evolution of the serotypes with, for example, type C and SAT 3 major antigenic regions reported to be under no positive Darwinian selection when VP1-coding sequences were analysed [24]. However, the low level of sequence divergence observed in this study is comparable to that observed in C 1 subtype strains from Europe, which showed very little change from 1953 to 1989 [4]. The absence of significant sequence divergence in type C strains has also been reported in India [25].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Differences exist in the selection forces shaping the evolution of the serotypes with, for example, type C and SAT 3 major antigenic regions reported to be under no positive Darwinian selection when VP1-coding sequences were analysed [24]. However, the low level of sequence divergence observed in this study is comparable to that observed in C 1 subtype strains from Europe, which showed very little change from 1953 to 1989 [4]. The absence of significant sequence divergence in type C strains has also been reported in India [25].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…As a rule of thumb, distances of Ͻ5% are considered to indicate the same "strain" (30,31). At the other end of the spectrum, distances of more than 15% have been considered sufficient to classify isolates as unrelated (26,32), although because of the greater variation in the SATs, a higher threshold of 20% has been suggested (20). However, this leaves a range of 5 to 15% phylogenetic distances that are undefined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accumulation of these changes in geographically isolated virus lineages allows for the division of serotypes into topotypes, groups of genetically similar viruses associated with a particular geographic area (Knowles and Samuel 2003). Strains within topotypes share a common evolutionary history that is distinct from strains within other topotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%