2005
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.43.12.6130-6132.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Evolution of Human Influenza A/H3N2 Virus in Asia and Europe from 2001 to 2003

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggested that air travel facilitates spread of both pandemic and seasonal influenza even in the summer of the Northern Hemisphere, which is consistent with the rapid natural replacement of seasonal H3N2 influenza variants in the world in recent years, as shown by the example of the year 2009 mentioned earlier 12 , 13 , 14 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This suggested that air travel facilitates spread of both pandemic and seasonal influenza even in the summer of the Northern Hemisphere, which is consistent with the rapid natural replacement of seasonal H3N2 influenza variants in the world in recent years, as shown by the example of the year 2009 mentioned earlier 12 , 13 , 14 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In contrast to previous studies where only human influenza isolates have been analysed (for examples, see [24,25]), we chose to incorporate sequences from isolates of both human and animal origin, as it is widely expected that the next pandemic influenza strain will evolve from an animal, most likely avian, strain. Further justification for this approach is provided by published data showing that (i) animal influenza sequences have been incorporated into circulating human influenza viruses by genetic re-assortment [26,27] and (ii) that swine act as a long-term reservoir and genetic 'melting pot' for avian, human and swine viruses [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Influenza isolates were identified using HA inhibition assay and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sequencing methods similar to those previously described for influenza H3N2 and B viruses. 25,26 If the 2 methods yielded different results, the PCR sequence was used to determine antigenic similarity to the vaccine. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded on the diary card and were defined for this study as any clinically significant event (following administration of the vaccine dose), including but not limited to the following events: (1) those that required prescription or nonprescription medication within 15 days postvaccination (days 0 -14), (2) those that required an unscheduled healthcare provider visit or consultation within 28 days of vaccination, (3) those that resulted in study termination, or (4) any other clinically significant event occurring at any point during the study period.…”
Section: Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%