2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Hybridization of Potent and Selective γ-Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) Ligands: Design, Synthesis, Binding Studies, and Molecular Modeling of Novel 3-Hydroxycyclopent-1-enecarboxylic Acid (HOCPCA) and trans-γ-Hydroxycrotonic Acid (T-HCA) Analogs

Abstract: γ-Hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) is a neuroactive substance with specific high-affinity binding sites. To facilitate target identification and ligand optimization, we herein report a comprehensive structure-affinity relationship study for novel ligands targeting these binding sites. A molecular hybridization strategy was used based on the conformationally restricted 3-hydroxycyclopent-1-enecarboxylic acid (HOCPCA) and the linear GHB analog trans-4-hydroxycrotonic acid (T-HCA). In general, all structural modificatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(137 reference statements)
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been much interest in comparing the structures of the ligands inside a receptor/protein with those of the free molecules, both determined by X-ray crystallography. While the X-ray geometry usually, as in the present case, matches the minimum-energy geometry calculated theoretically (both after optimization which relaxes the geometry), the geometry of the small molecule within the receptor only coincides in some cases; in others it differs by as much as 40 kJ mol À1 (Boströ m et al, 1998;Perola & Charifson, 2004;Fu et al, 2011;Sitzmann et al, 2012;Krall et al, 2017;Hawkins, 2017). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that they act on the same receptor.…”
Section: Theoretical Calculationssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…There has been much interest in comparing the structures of the ligands inside a receptor/protein with those of the free molecules, both determined by X-ray crystallography. While the X-ray geometry usually, as in the present case, matches the minimum-energy geometry calculated theoretically (both after optimization which relaxes the geometry), the geometry of the small molecule within the receptor only coincides in some cases; in others it differs by as much as 40 kJ mol À1 (Boströ m et al, 1998;Perola & Charifson, 2004;Fu et al, 2011;Sitzmann et al, 2012;Krall et al, 2017;Hawkins, 2017). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that they act on the same receptor.…”
Section: Theoretical Calculationssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Under a mild condition, the bioactive chiral acid 10 was readily prepared by oxidation of 2m with H 2 O 2 and NaClO 2 (Fig. 6d ) 67 .
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Krall et al . ) and the MCT1/2 inhibitor AR‐C141990 (( R )‐5‐(3‐hydroxypyrrolidine‐1‐carbonyl)‐1‐isobutyl‐3‐methyl‐6‐(quinolin‐4‐ylmethyl)thieno[2,3‐ d ]pyrimidine‐2,4(1 H ,3 H )‐dione), which was synthesized as described previously (Thiesen et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%