2018
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/197/1/012046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Identification and Serogrouping of Pasteurella mutocida Field Isolats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem with the limitation of sample size in this study also be found as previously reported by other researchers in Indonesia. Pujiono et al [27] just used three P. multocida isolates to identify and serogroup of P. multocida field isolates. In their study, they were combined the use of 16S rRNA test with other specific primers such as the primers to amplify the kmt gene and bcbD gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem with the limitation of sample size in this study also be found as previously reported by other researchers in Indonesia. Pujiono et al [27] just used three P. multocida isolates to identify and serogroup of P. multocida field isolates. In their study, they were combined the use of 16S rRNA test with other specific primers such as the primers to amplify the kmt gene and bcbD gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isolates were collected from cases of fowl cholera in poultry in 5 provinces of Korea between 2014 and 2019, and the host, age, clinical signs, macroscopic lesions and the mortality rate for each case are shown in Table 1. The isolates were cultured on blood agar (Synergy Innovation, Seongnam, Korea) and MacConkey agar (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) in the air at 37°C for 24 h. Suspected colonies (mucoid and non-haemolytic) were identified by Gram staining and biochemical identification using the VITEK II system (BioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) according to the previous methods (Pujiono et al, 2018). For further confirmation, PCR assay was performed with primers specific for the amplification of the KMT1 gene (Townsend et al, 1998).…”
Section: Bacterial Isolates and Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ough distinction of Pasteurella from related genera, and typically distinction of P. multocida from non-multocida Pasteurella species,was feasible prior to the advent of these methods (papers which did not adequately categorize their infectious agents as definitively belonging to the Pasteurella genus having been excluded from our analysis), advancements have shown that even with current molecular methods, proper identification of non-multocida species remains challenging [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%