2017
DOI: 10.14214/sf.1691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular identification of bamboo genera and species based on RAPD-RFLP markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of PIC produced in this study ranged from 0.90 to 0.98. Our result was higher than Konzen et al's (2017) RAPD, where PIC ranged from 0.00 to 0.94. However, our observations were in coherence with the PIC results from Desai et al (2015).…”
Section: Rapd Primer Screening and Amplification Profile Analysis Rapcontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The value of PIC produced in this study ranged from 0.90 to 0.98. Our result was higher than Konzen et al's (2017) RAPD, where PIC ranged from 0.00 to 0.94. However, our observations were in coherence with the PIC results from Desai et al (2015).…”
Section: Rapd Primer Screening and Amplification Profile Analysis Rapcontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Total 16 unique bands (1.8% from the total) were characterised. This percentage number is lower compared with the result of Konzen et al (2017).…”
Section: Unique Bandscontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The markers clearly clustered ten cultivars into 3 groups, highlighting the genetic resemblance between cultivars in each group. Afterward, combined use of marker systems has been used in several studies such as RAPD-AFLP (Nag et al, 2013), RAPD-ISSR (Desai et al, 2015), RAPD-RFLP (Konzen, Perón, Ito, Brondani, & Tsai, 2017), RAPD with morphological traits (Shalini, Meena, Tarafdar, & Thakur, 2013), and morphological traits with…”
Section: Molecular Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The markers clearly clustered ten cultivars into 3 groups, highlighting the genetic resemblance between cultivars in each group. Afterward, combined use of marker systems has been used in several studies such as RAPD‐AFLP (Nag et al., 2013), RAPD‐ISSR (Desai et al., 2015), RAPD‐RFLP (Konzen, Perón, Ito, Brondani, & Tsai, 2017), RAPD with morphological traits (Shalini, Meena, Tarafdar, & Thakur, 2013), and morphological traits with sequence‐related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers (Zhu, Liu, Tang, Fu, & Tang, 2014). Genetic diversity between cultivars of Phyllostachys violascens was reported using combinations of ISSR, AFLP, and SRAP markers (Lin et al., 2011).…”
Section: Prospects For Genomics‐assisted Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%