2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00044-015-1436-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular insight into the inhibition mechanism of plant and rat 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase by molecular docking and DFT calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of emergence of sulcotrione resistant, therefore obtaining HPPD inhibitors with novel scaffolds is an urgent task for herbicide developers. The inhibitory mechanism has been found in previous studies (Lin et al, 2013 ; Silva et al, 2015 ). In HPPD, active site Fe(II) octahedral coordination sphere is accomplished by forming coordinating interaction with three protein ligand atoms and three water molecules.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Because of emergence of sulcotrione resistant, therefore obtaining HPPD inhibitors with novel scaffolds is an urgent task for herbicide developers. The inhibitory mechanism has been found in previous studies (Lin et al, 2013 ; Silva et al, 2015 ). In HPPD, active site Fe(II) octahedral coordination sphere is accomplished by forming coordinating interaction with three protein ligand atoms and three water molecules.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For this work, considering that the chiral carbon is irrelevant to determine the toxicity of this neurotoxic agent, an equal pair of stereoisomers considering both chiral centers ( R , R P ) and ( S , S P ) was thus chosen [ 7 ]. The R P and S P stereoisomers of these compounds were individually docked inside the crystallographic structure of DFPase (PDB code 2GVV; resolution = 1.73 Å) [ 13 ], using the Molegro Virtual Docker program (MVD ® ) [ 21 ], taking into account the same procedures employed in other studies and the previous removal of the original ligand DcPPA [ 22 , 23 , 24 ]. For the development of the docking calculations, it was considered a radius of 5 Å centered at the active site, with the residues being kept as flexible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compounds were then docked inside the crystallographic structure of viral protein M pro (PDB code 6LU7; resolution = 2.16 Å), [25] using the Molegro Virtual Docker program (MVD®), [26] taking into account the same procedures employed previously. [27][28][29] According to our calculation protocol, it was considered a radius of about 20 Å, where the residues of the catalytic triad were kept as exible. Due to the nature of the docking methods, the calculations were carried out, generating approximately 50 poses (hence such as conformation and orientation) for each ligand studied.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%