Dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and carbon (DOC) often dominate the dissolved nitrogen and organic carbon fluxes from rivers, yet they are not considered to affect coastal water quality because of their assumed refractory nature. The objective of this study was to quantify DON and DOC bioavailability to bacteria in 9 rivers on the east coast of the United States during a 6 d dark bioassay experiment. Water was collected from the freshwater portion of a forest stream in New Jersey (Forest 17a), and from the Bass (New Jersey), Delaware (New Jersey), Hudson (New York), Altamaha (Georgia), Savannah (Georgia), Pocomoke (Maryland), Choptank (Maryland), and Peconic (New York) Rivers during base-flow conditions. DON concentrations ranged from 1 to 35 µM and comprised 8 to 94% of the total dissolved nitrogen (TDN) in these rivers. Bioassay results indicate that 23% (± 4) of the DON (2 ± 1 µM) was bioavailable in all the rivers except the Bass and Pocomoke, where no DON consumption was measured. Of the TDN consumed by bacteria, DON comprised 43% (± 6), demonstrating that DON is an important nitrogen source for bacteria. In contrast, only 4% (±1) of DOC (12 ± 3 µM), was bioavailable in the 9 rivers. Percent-wise, 8 times more DON was consumed relative to DOC in 6 of the rivers, demonstrating that DON cycles faster than DOC. Overall, our study demonstrates that DON is an important part of the TDN pool that needs to be incorporated into coastal nitrogen loading budgets because it is bioavailable on the order of days.
KEY WORDS: Bacteria · Bioavailability · DON · DOC · Rivers
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherAquat Microb Ecol 43: [277][278][279][280][281][282][283][284][285][286][287] 2006 Bioavailability of DOM in rivers is largely affected by the chemical composition of the DOM pool (Sun et al. 1997). Chemical composition of this pool is determined by the sources of DOM to the river. Riverine DOM can originate from numerous natural and anthropogenic watershed sources, atmospheric deposition, and autochthonous production. DOM bioavailability has been shown to vary with DOM source (Seitzinger et al. 2002). For example, DOM in rain, suburban/urban runoff, and released from autochthonous production is very bioavailable to bacteria and some algae (Bronk & Glibert 1993, Seitzinger & Sanders 1999, Glibert et al. 2001, Seitzinger et al. 2002, whereas DOM from forests, wetlands, and agricultural soils is less bioavailable (reviewed in Wiegner & Seitzinger 2004). Hence, the relative contribution of DOM from these sources will affect how much of the DOM in rivers is bioavailable.Riverine DOM bioavailability is also affected by chemical, biological, and physical processes of the terrestrial landscape, as well as of the river. Microbial consumption, sorption to soil particles, and hydrological transport pathways can alter the chemical composition of DOM entering rivers (reviewed in AitkenheadPeterson et al. 2003). Photochemical reactions and flocculation can further modify the c...