2004
DOI: 10.3816/cgc.2004.n.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Markers and Prostate Cancer Prognosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various clinical variables have been used, singly and in combination (nomograms, tables, etc. ), to predict, preoperatively, which patients are likely to fail definitive therapy (4). However, the predictive value of these variables has been thwarted by the vexing biological diversity of clinical prostate cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various clinical variables have been used, singly and in combination (nomograms, tables, etc. ), to predict, preoperatively, which patients are likely to fail definitive therapy (4). However, the predictive value of these variables has been thwarted by the vexing biological diversity of clinical prostate cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum PSA levels correlate only marginally with cancer volume as, on a per cell basis, higher expression is noted in benign prostate cells than cancerous cells 27. Many studies have explored a potential utility for tissue‐based gene or protein markers to add to prognostic information obtained from standard histology 28–32. In this study, we show that ÎČ2M expression in primary prostate cancer specimens is associated with features linked to clinically aggressive disease including high Gleason grade and the presence of perineural invasion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A recent study showed that cases positive for the antibodies S0456, EP1972-1, S0725M, and S5073, which are directed against the protein products of the genes Hey2 , STMN1 , CYP4Z1 , and CDH1 , had poorer prognosis than did those that were negative for these antibodies [11,12]. Although the study did not deal with hypoechoic lesions on TRUS, the authors speculated that such molecular markers may be detected in prostate cancer with hypoechoic lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%