1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1395(199709)10:9<697::aid-poc905>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular mechanics calculations (MM3) on silanes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation between the various conformations will be discussed in detail in Section 3.4. In agreement with earlier reports [11,13,15], all methods predict the chair conformation to be the global minimum, hence it will be treated as the dominant conformation.…”
Section: Conformations Of Silacyclohexanesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relation between the various conformations will be discussed in detail in Section 3.4. In agreement with earlier reports [11,13,15], all methods predict the chair conformation to be the global minimum, hence it will be treated as the dominant conformation.…”
Section: Conformations Of Silacyclohexanesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The energy differences between chair and twist were calculated to be in the range of 1.7 and 2.2 kcal mol ±1 and between twist and boat about 0.2±0.3 kcal mol ±1 . In a recent MM3 report these energy differences were calculated to be 1.8 and 0.2 kcal mol ±1 , respectively [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To generate all the plausible conformers, we chose to use a Monte Carlo style conformational search (MC) as implemented in MacroModel. , Indeed, in contrast with dynamics, MC calculations do not provide dynamic information on the system, since particles of the system are simply moved randomly according to statistical rules. Concerning the choice of the force field, MM2* was selected because it led to very good parameters for all molecules, in contrast to MM3*, which led to 76−120 “bad” or “general” parameters, mainly due to the O−Si−O and pyridine moieties . The number of conformers found using an energetic window of 15 kJ mol -1 is reported in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First a test set of molecules was created and MM3 atoms types were assigned to each species. This test set primarily included molecules that were used to parametrize the existing MM3 parameters as described in various publications; however, it was necessary to add a substantial number of additional molecules in order to cover a larger selection of the MM3 bonding types. This test set is listed in the online Supporting Information.…”
Section: Morse Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%