1994
DOI: 10.1016/0022-328x(94)80150-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular mechanics (MM2) calculations and cone angles of phosphine ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 Mosbo and coworkers suggested using Boltzmann weighted cone angles to overcome the problem of multiple conformations solution. 18,19 The significant difference in ligand-repulsive energy between the lowest energy form of P(OPh) 3 (E R = 87 kcal/mol) and a low energy form only 0.70 kcal/mol higher in energy (E R = 66 kcal/mol) suggests the need to consider a Boltzmann weighted set of ligand repulsive energies as likely to be more representative of the effective steric requirement of the ligand. In solution, these two conformers will compete for binding to a reaction center.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Mosbo and coworkers suggested using Boltzmann weighted cone angles to overcome the problem of multiple conformations solution. 18,19 The significant difference in ligand-repulsive energy between the lowest energy form of P(OPh) 3 (E R = 87 kcal/mol) and a low energy form only 0.70 kcal/mol higher in energy (E R = 66 kcal/mol) suggests the need to consider a Boltzmann weighted set of ligand repulsive energies as likely to be more representative of the effective steric requirement of the ligand. In solution, these two conformers will compete for binding to a reaction center.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conformation for the fast-reacting enantiomer is more stable because the lone pair, not the methyl, eclipses the aromatic ring. Such conformations have been previously identified as low-energy conformations (37 …”
Section: Front View Side Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of conformational variations was evoked early [21], leading to use weighted average cone angles [22], while it was considered that this problem was overcome by the use of the solid angle methodology [23]. At the same time, Mü ller and Mingos noticed also that the Tolman cone angle definition does not take into account the variations due to conformational changes [24,25], and they used the atomic centers of the ligand atoms rather than their van der Waals spheres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%