SummaryAmmonia excretion at the gills of fish has been studied for 80 years, but the mechanism(s) involved remain controversial. The relatively recent discovery of the ammonia-transporting function of the Rhesus (Rh) proteins, a family related to the Mep/Amt family of methyl ammonia and ammonia transporters in bacteria, yeast and plants, and the occurrence of these genes and glycosylated proteins in fish gills has opened a new paradigm. We provide background on the evolution and function of the Rh proteins, and review recent studies employing molecular physiology which demonstrate their important contribution to branchial ammonia efflux. Rhag occurs in red blood cells, whereas several isoforms of both Rhbg and Rhcg occur in many tissues. In the branchial epithelium, Rhcg appears to be localized in apical membranes and Rhbg in basolateral membranes. Their gene expression is upregulated during exposure to high environmental ammonia or internal ammonia infusion, and may be sensitive to synergistic stimulation by ammonia and cortisol. Rhcg in particular appears to be coupled to H + excretion and Na + uptake mechanisms. We propose a new model for ammonia excretion in freshwater fish and its variable linkage to Na + uptake and acid excretion. In this model, Rhag facilitates NH 3 flux out of the erythrocyte, Rhbg moves it across the basolateral membrane of the branchial ionocyte, and an apical "Na
THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
2304and helps to explain some of the discrepancies in the earlier literature.
Retrospection on past controversiesSince the classic divided chamber experiments of Homer Smith (Smith, 1929), it has been known that freshwater fish excrete their nitrogen waste predominantly as ammonia through the gills. August Krogh (Krogh, 1939) presented circumstantial evidence that ammonia excretion is in some way linked to active Na + uptake at the gills of freshwater animals. Jean Maetz (Maetz and GarciaRomeu, 1964) presented experimental evidence for direct Na + /NH 4 + exchange linkage in freshwater fish. Since then, our understanding of how ammonia actually permeates the gills has become less and less clear, as various studies have led to conflicting conclusions. Evidence has been presented to reinforce the predominance of Na + /NH 4 + exchange (Maetz, 1973; Kerstetter and Keeler, 1976;Payan and Girard, 1978;Pressley et al., 1981;McDonald and Prior, 1988;McDonald and Milligan, 1988), whereas others have argued for the dominance of simple NH 3 diffusion down the partial pressure NH 3 gradient maintained by the CO 2 hydration reaction in the gill boundary layer (Cameron and Heisler, 1983;Wilson et al., 1994;Wilkie and Wood, 1994). Intermediate positions have included flexible coupling via diffusion trapping of NH 3 linked to Na + /H + or H + pump/Na + channel mechanisms (Avella and Bornancin, 1989;Heisler, 1990), or mixed mechanisms whereby ammonia moves partly by diffusion and partly by electroneutral exchange (Wright and Wood, 1985;Salama et al., 1999). The overall problem is that ammonia excretion h...