“…Thus linear regression of the computed and experimental 11 B NMR shifts yields an R 2 value for the 2,7,1,12 isomer of 0.9954, compared with R 2 = 0.8676 for the next-best isomer (2,7,3,12). In terms of 1 H NMR shifts, the difference in the sum (DSd) of the calculated and actual chemical shifts for the two C cage H resonance signals is only 1.21 ppm for the 2,7,1,12 isomer, compared with 5.01 ppm for the next-best isomer (2,7,4,12). Finally, of all of the ten isomers the lowest free energy computed (BP86-D3 with a correction for the THF solvent) was for the 2,7,1,12 isomer, which had a value 3.5 kcal mol À1 below that of the next most stable isomer (2,7,4,12).…”