2006
DOI: 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular phylogenetics of the gomphoid-phalloid fungi with an establishment of the new subclass Phallomycetidae and two new orders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
83
4
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
10
83
4
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The sequestrate genus Rhodactina also has longitudinally ridged/winged spores, however it is quite distinct morphologically, lacking the blue staining of the sporocarp and the spores are deep purple. Analyses of DNA data has confirmed that Gautieria is related to the Ramariaceae (Giachini et al 2010;Humpert et al 2001), Austrogautiera to the Hysterangiales (Hosaka et al 2006), and Rhodactina and Chamonixia to the Boletaceae (Binder and Bresinsky 2002;Kretzer and Bruns 1999;Yang et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The sequestrate genus Rhodactina also has longitudinally ridged/winged spores, however it is quite distinct morphologically, lacking the blue staining of the sporocarp and the spores are deep purple. Analyses of DNA data has confirmed that Gautieria is related to the Ramariaceae (Giachini et al 2010;Humpert et al 2001), Austrogautiera to the Hysterangiales (Hosaka et al 2006), and Rhodactina and Chamonixia to the Boletaceae (Binder and Bresinsky 2002;Kretzer and Bruns 1999;Yang et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Based on results of molecular analyses, this group including the Phallales was later defined as subclass Phallomycetidae within the Agaricomycetes by Hosaka et al (2006). Hydnum repandum is not related to the Phallomycetidae as this species belongs to the cantharelloid clade (Hibbett 2006;Moncalvo et al 2006) or Cantharellales (Hibbett 2006), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our opinion, the combination of its described morphological features suggests that this species may belong to either Sclerogaster or Schenella (= Pyrenogaster) (Geastrales) (Hosaka et al 2006;Hosaka and Castellano 2008). These genera are more-or-less cosmopolitan and have rhizomorphs, yellowish to brownish sporocarps, and small, thin-walled, ornamented spores.…”
Section: Comments On Corditubera Microsporamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These genera are more-or-less cosmopolitan and have rhizomorphs, yellowish to brownish sporocarps, and small, thin-walled, ornamented spores. In addition, at least some species have gelatinized tissues, thin-walled basidia, crystalline structures in their peridia, and capillitium-like elements in the gleba (Dominguez de Toledo and Castellano 1996;Hosaka et al 2006;Hosaka and Castellano 2008). However, due to the poor condition of the remaining material, we feel that any taxonomic changes would be premature and we await new collections before making any definitive conclusions about C. microspora.…”
Section: Comments On Corditubera Microsporamentioning
confidence: 98%