2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Phylogeny Reveals High Diversity, Geographic Structure and Limited Ranges in Neotenic Net-Winged Beetles Platerodrilus (Coleoptera: Lycidae)

Abstract: The neotenic Platerodrilus net-winged beetles have strongly modified development where females do not pupate and retain larval morphology when sexually mature. As a result, dispersal propensity of females is extremely low and the lineage can be used for reconstruction of ancient dispersal and vicariance patterns and identification of centres of diversity. We identified three deep lineages in Platerodrilus occurring predominantly in (1) Borneo and the Philippines, (2) continental Asia, and (3) Sumatra, the Mala… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, neotenic Calopterini were placed to Leptolycini (Miller, ; Kazantsev, ), but the molecular analyses rejected such placement (Masek et al , ; Kalousova, ). Based on results from previous studies and our transcriptomic phylogeny (Figs A–C, S1–S6; Bocak et al , ; Masek et al , , ), we propose that the adult male morphology is considerably affected by the ontogenetic reprogramming that produces larviform females, and that common occurrences of parallel evolution could obscure morphological analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, neotenic Calopterini were placed to Leptolycini (Miller, ; Kazantsev, ), but the molecular analyses rejected such placement (Masek et al , ; Kalousova, ). Based on results from previous studies and our transcriptomic phylogeny (Figs A–C, S1–S6; Bocak et al , ; Masek et al , , ), we propose that the adult male morphology is considerably affected by the ontogenetic reprogramming that produces larviform females, and that common occurrences of parallel evolution could obscure morphological analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Since then, larviform females have been identified in other lycid taxa. Additional presumed neotenics are currently known in a high number of males and their relationships, morphology and distribution indicate a possibility that conspecific females are larviform, although this hypothesis has not been verified (Crowson, ; Cicero, ; Bocak & Bocakova, ; Miller, ; Kazantsev, , ; Bocak et al , ; Masek et al , , ; McMahon & Hayward, ). We considered these taxa to be neotenic in our analysis in agreement with the opinion of the listed authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult Iberobaenia differs from Lycidae by the filiform male antennae with a long antennomere 2, the absence of the sharp lateral edge and strengthening structures in the pronotum, the elytra without costae or tubercles, and the uncompressed legs ( figure 1a,b). Yet, some characters are shared between both families, such as the v-shaped phallobase that is similar to those in some Lyropaeini [34] and the short prosternum with two apical processes (although these are directed upwards; figure 1b). Females are absent in our sample and we suppose that they remain larviform or at least incompletely metamorphosed when sexually mature, with a short lifespan and cryptic lifestyle.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Relationships and Morphological Traits Of Ibementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Convergences in these traits have to be seen in the context of miniaturization of males, i.e. sexually linked body size differentiation [34,35] and hypothesized to be a result of the K-and r-strategy of the respective sexes [4]. Miniaturization is linked to the absence of the pronotal carinae and elytral costae as strengthening structures.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Relationships and Morphological Traits Of Ibementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation