2015
DOI: 10.5958/0976-058x.2015.00068.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular profiling and genetic diversity of mungbean (Vigna radiataL.) genotypes using ISSR and SSR markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results reported by earlier Tonk et al, (2011) in Hypericum perforatum L. using RAPD primers. In contrast to our results the higher PIC (0.907) reported by Sao et al, (2015) in molecular profiling of mungbean using ISSR and SSR markers. But lower PIC values (0.22 to 0.36) reported by Kameli et al, (2013) in Satureja species using 10 ISSR primers and also it was ranged from 0.13 to 0.20 reported by Satyanarayana et al, (2010) in Mucuna using AFLP primers.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Issr Polymorphismcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results reported by earlier Tonk et al, (2011) in Hypericum perforatum L. using RAPD primers. In contrast to our results the higher PIC (0.907) reported by Sao et al, (2015) in molecular profiling of mungbean using ISSR and SSR markers. But lower PIC values (0.22 to 0.36) reported by Kameli et al, (2013) in Satureja species using 10 ISSR primers and also it was ranged from 0.13 to 0.20 reported by Satyanarayana et al, (2010) in Mucuna using AFLP primers.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Issr Polymorphismcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The grain/seeds of the cultivars Sulata, Pant-U-31, Kalindi, Sarada and Gautam were almost alike. So, any combination of these SSR primers can be used for ascertaining the seed purity or admixture and genetic purity at any stage of the growth period (LESTARI et al, 2014;NATH et al, 2017;SANGHANI et al, 2015;SAO et al, 2015). DNA fingerprinting through its high precision in identifying crop varieties, holds considerable promise as a reliable tool of intellectual property protection of crop varieties and germplasm.…”
Section: Results and Disscussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diversity in plants provide an opportunity for developing new varieties and improved cultivars with desirable characteristics (Govindaraj et al, 2015;Saleh et al, 2016). A number of methodologies exist for the assessment of genetic diversity in maize, those are (i) morphological characterization (Ristic et al, 2014) (ii) biochemical characterization that uses electrophoresis to detect allelic variants of enzymes at gene level (Govindaraj et al, 2015) (iii) pedigree that employ the extraction of genealogical information (Drinic et al, 2012) and (iv) DNA molecular analyses (Sao et al, 2015) such as Simple Sequence Repeats (SSR), Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) (Mondini et al, 2009). …”
Section: Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease (Mlnd)mentioning
confidence: 99%