1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(95)80037-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
1,193
0
21

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,503 publications
(1,223 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
1,193
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2003, Cavasotto and coworkers demonstrated the applicability of this scoring function to the identification of the binding site of retinal in bovine rhodopsin and to the discrimination between binders and nonbinders of rhodopsin [67]. Similarly, using molecular databases spiked with known binders, a number of studies based on combinations of different scoring functions (such as Gold [68], Dock [69], CScore (Tripos), Fresno [70], Score [71], FlexX [72], and PMF [66]) have demonstrated the applicability of molecular docking at GPCR models to virtual screening [9,10,73]. In agreement with the expectations set by these studies, a variety of docking programs and scoring functions have been successfully applied to the discovery of novel ligands for a plethora of GPCRs, including neurorokinin [74,75], adrenergic [76], chemokine [75,77], dopamine [75], serotonin [75,78], cannabinoid [79], and free fatty acid receptors [80], among others.…”
Section: Structure-based Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2003, Cavasotto and coworkers demonstrated the applicability of this scoring function to the identification of the binding site of retinal in bovine rhodopsin and to the discrimination between binders and nonbinders of rhodopsin [67]. Similarly, using molecular databases spiked with known binders, a number of studies based on combinations of different scoring functions (such as Gold [68], Dock [69], CScore (Tripos), Fresno [70], Score [71], FlexX [72], and PMF [66]) have demonstrated the applicability of molecular docking at GPCR models to virtual screening [9,10,73]. In agreement with the expectations set by these studies, a variety of docking programs and scoring functions have been successfully applied to the discovery of novel ligands for a plethora of GPCRs, including neurorokinin [74,75], adrenergic [76], chemokine [75,77], dopamine [75], serotonin [75,78], cannabinoid [79], and free fatty acid receptors [80], among others.…”
Section: Structure-based Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this process, we used the molecular docking program GOLD (Genetic Optimization for Ligand Docking) [19,20] from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center. The X-ray structure of FP2 with its bound inhibitor E64 (PDB code: 3BPF) [21] was used and prepared for docking with Sybyl X 1.3 software.…”
Section: Molecular Dockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to confirm the interacting capability of these compounds towards hAChE, the manual docking analysis was carried out using the Genetic Optimization for Ligand Docking (GOLD) V4.0.1 [45,46] docking suite, which employs a genetic algorithm to find the different ligand binding modes. The crystal structure of hAChE (PDB ID: 1B41) [47] was chosen for docking analysis.…”
Section: Molecular Dockingmentioning
confidence: 99%