In most cases, concerns about gas
hydrates in hydrocarbon production
are often associated with shut-in and restart of the production system
associated with the fluids in the wellhead and the main flowline.
The exposure of the wellhead to cold temperatures during shutdown
can cause severe hydrate formation even with stagnant fluid in the
wellbore. Similar conditions may exist at the top of the gas line
in flowlines for hydrate formation when gas is saturated with water.
This study investigated the hydrate deposition kinetics and morphology
at 10 MPa (ca. 1400 psi), with the goal of preventing severe solid
hydrate formation from the vapor or supercritical phase near the wellhead
or a vertical conduit exposed to cold conditions such as road overpass
or river crossing during shutdown and providing operating guidelines
for hydrate management by understanding the impact of volatile (methanol)
and non-volatile (monethylene glycol, MEG) thermodynamic hydrate inhibitors
(THIs). These results may also apply to top of line hydrate and its
inhibition. It was verified that non-volatile THI is ineffective in
preventing hydrate deposition near the wellhead, showing growth behavior
of hydrate formation in the presence of MEG similar to that with lower
pressure without inhibitors. However, volatile THI prevents hydrate
deposition in a cold wellhead even though the experimental condition
provides sufficient convection and water condensation. In the warm
wellhead, volatile THI does not prevent hydrate formation, but it
delays the growth of hydrate deposits. In the presence of volatile
THI, the dissociation and reformation of hydrate deposits on the vertical
wall are observed. This study provides a quantifiable method for hydrate
growth in real-time and insight into better management strategies
for THI usage to mitigate hydrate blockage risk near the wellhead.