2005
DOI: 10.1039/b509723c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular structure calculations without clamping the nuclei

Abstract: A number of recent papers have considered ways in which molecular structure may be calculated when both the electrons and the nuclei are treated from the outset as quantum particles. This is in contrast to the conventional approach in which the nuclei initially have their positions fixed and so merely provide a potential for electronic motion. The usual approach is generally assumed to be justified by the 1927 work of Born and Oppenheimer. In this paper we discuss what precisely might be anticipated in the way… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where r nn gh (R n ) is the internuclear separation distance expressed in terms of the {R n } and the inverse mass matrix 1/µ n gh is in standard form 11 . The electronic and nuclear motions are coupled only via a potential term,…”
Section: The Coulomb Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where r nn gh (R n ) is the internuclear separation distance expressed in terms of the {R n } and the inverse mass matrix 1/µ n gh is in standard form 11 . The electronic and nuclear motions are coupled only via a potential term,…”
Section: The Coulomb Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, if it is possible, the first way should be preferred, since it allows to develop a deeper insight about the terms we are neglecting and the specific details that we will miss. However, although in virtually every quantum chemistry book [18,19,[26][27][28] hand-waving derivations up to different levels of detail are performed and the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is typically presented as unproblematic, it seems that the fine mathematical details on which these 'standard' approaches are based are far from clear [29][30][31]. This state of affairs does not imply that the final equations that will need to be solved are ill-defined or that the numerical methods based on the theory are unstable; in fact, it is just the contrary (see the discussion below), because the problems are related only to the precise relation between the concepts in the whole theory and those in its simplified version.…”
Section: Unit Of Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, by calculating the expectation value for the distance of a nucleus picked out from the set of type X and another one from the set of type Y nuclei, a single mean value is obtained even if in the classical molecular structure one would measure several different X-Y bond lengths. 11,13,24 This problem was described in a numerical all-particle study of the H + 3 molecular ion by Cafiero and Adamowicz. 12 By calculating the expectation values of the proton-proton distance and the angle for the three protons it was not possible to decide whether the molecule has a linear or a triangular shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%