2021
DOI: 10.3390/parasitologia1040021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Survey of Anaplasmataceae Agents and Coxiellaceae in Non-Hematophagous Bats and Associated Ectoparasites from Brazil

Abstract: The Anaplasmataceae family (order Rickettsiales) encompasses obligately intracellular bacteria of the genera Anaplasma, Ehrlichia, and Neorickettsia. Together with Coxiella burnetii (Coxiellaceae family, order Legionellales), these bacteria represent important causative agents of diseases in humans and animals. The scarcity of studies that investigated the occurrence of these agents in bats and their associated ectoparasites, emphasizes the need to achieve a better understanding of the role of these animals in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the primers and probes used might have not been able to hybridize to groEL gene of the putative novel genotypes of Ehrlichia and Anaplasma found in this body of work. Similar results were found when screening biological samples of armadillos, sloths, anteaters (Calchi et al, 2020), and bats (Ikeda et al, 2021) for Ehrlichia and Anaplasma using this qPCR protocol. On the other hand, Ehrlichia and Anaplasma genotypes were detected in biological samples from wild rodents (Benevenute et al, 2017) and wild birds (Sacchi et al, 2021) using the referred qPCR assay.…”
Section: 54supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Therefore, the primers and probes used might have not been able to hybridize to groEL gene of the putative novel genotypes of Ehrlichia and Anaplasma found in this body of work. Similar results were found when screening biological samples of armadillos, sloths, anteaters (Calchi et al, 2020), and bats (Ikeda et al, 2021) for Ehrlichia and Anaplasma using this qPCR protocol. On the other hand, Ehrlichia and Anaplasma genotypes were detected in biological samples from wild rodents (Benevenute et al, 2017) and wild birds (Sacchi et al, 2021) using the referred qPCR assay.…”
Section: 54supporting
confidence: 78%
“…and Anaplasma spp. in different orders of wild animals [1, [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. These epidemiological studies indicate an abundant diversity of Anaplasmataceae agents circulating in wild mammals, pointing out the occurrence of putative new species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2020, in the regions of Pernambuco and Ceará, one rodent (Wiedomys pyrrhorhinos) and one marsupial (Didelphis albiventris) were seroreactive to C. burnetii at endpoint titers of 128 and 4,096, respectively, by IFA test, no phase I or phase II specification (Oliveira et al, 2020). Finally, in 2021, Mato Grosso do Sul, Ikeda et al (2021) sampled 135 non-hematophagous bats and did not find real-time PCR positivity for C. burnetii based on the IS1111 gene. Therefore, bats do not act as important hosts in epidemiology or C. burnetii in Brazil.…”
Section: Situation In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%