2021
DOI: 10.3390/jmp2020014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Tests for Risk-Stratifying Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: An Overview of Commercially Available Testing Platforms in the United States

Abstract: The past decade has witnessed significant advances in the application of molecular diagnostics for the pre-operative risk-stratification of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. The tests that are currently marketed in the United States for this purpose combine aspects of tumor genotyping with gene and/or microRNA expression profiling. This review compares the general methodology and clinical validation studies for the three tests currently offered in the United States: ThyroSeq v3, Afirma GSC and Xpres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the moment, four molecular tests are commercially available in the USA to diagnose and evaluate RR for TCs. Principally, each single test is able to detect BRAF as well as molecular alterations of RET on FNA samples [18,34]. Despite this, partial information is available on the effectiveness of molecular tests for cytopathology diagnosis of TCs.…”
Section: Epidemiological Monitoring Valid Bms and New Proposals For Tcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the moment, four molecular tests are commercially available in the USA to diagnose and evaluate RR for TCs. Principally, each single test is able to detect BRAF as well as molecular alterations of RET on FNA samples [18,34]. Despite this, partial information is available on the effectiveness of molecular tests for cytopathology diagnosis of TCs.…”
Section: Epidemiological Monitoring Valid Bms and New Proposals For Tcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, histological classification of TC variants remains the best BM for diagnosis and prognosis of thyroid malignancies [15,16]. However, numerous molecules have been proposed as adequate diagnostic and risk BMs for TCs in recent times [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the introduction of the next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms, testing strategies have moved away from the traditional method, which allows the sequencing of a limited number of genes, in favor of massive parallel sequencing. However, the custom NGS panels specifically developed to comprehensively cover thyroid-specific genomic alterations by centralized laboratories are proprietary and not commercially available or locally employable (e.g., Thyroseq) [7]. Conversely, cancer-generic NGS panels, featuring the most common genomic alterations found in solid tumors, represent a possible solution for the processing of cytological samples.…”
Section: From Single Gene Testing To Parallel and Massive Sequencing Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the "ideal" molecular test is also influenced by the local prevalence of thyroid neoplasms and the resulting difference in malignancy rates in each TBSRTC category [3,6]. These advances and comprehensive thyroid-specific commercially available tests are centralized in North America private laboratories; in countries with universal healthcare system coverage like in Europe, the access to such advanced molecular tests can be prohibitive because of its very high cost and lack of reimbursement policies [7] As an alternative to thyroid-specific comprehensive testing, several centers have introduced sustainable solutions based on either the adoption of commercially available generic cancer panels not specifically designed for thyroid samples or the design and validation of narrow custom panels targeting the most relevant genomic alterations involved in thyroid carcinogenesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These now conventional predictive markers for thyroid cancer are based on genotypes, and the predictive abilities of these tests are variable and highly dependent on regional differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) prevalence and genetic signatures (4,5). In the United States, three main types of molecular tests have been commercially developed over the past decade for cytologically undetermined thyroid nodules: ThyroSeq v3 (University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre and Sonic Healthcare, USA); ThyGeNEXT and ThyraMIR (Interpace Diagnostics, USA); and Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier (GSC) and Xpression Atlas (Veracyte, USA), with sensitivities of 94%, 93%, and 91% and specificities of 82%, 62%, and 68%, respectively (10). Despite the great sensitivities, the assays lack specificity, causing concern in endocrinologists and patients alike in light of many operations performed for what appeared to be suspicious lesions but proven to be benign after all (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%