2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b09552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Theory and the Effects of Solute Attractive Forces on Hydrophobic Interactions

Abstract: The role of solute attractive forces on hydrophobic interactions is studied by coordinated development of theory and simulation results for Ar atoms in water. We present a concise derivation of the local molecular field (LMF) theory for the effects of solute attractive forces on hydrophobic interactions, a derivation that clarifies the close relation of LMF theory to the EXP approximation applied to this problem long ago. The simulation results show that change from purely repulsive atomic solute interactions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
7
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide a more stringent test of LMF theory for very strong hydrophobic interactions we also considered the association of repulsive-core Weeks-Chandler-Andersen (WCA) versions of both the Ar and fullerene solutes, where both solute-water and solute-solute VDW attractions are turned off. Understanding the changes in hydrophobic interactions resulting from VDW solute-solvent and solvent-solvent attractions has been the focus of much recent work (72)(73)(74)(75).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide a more stringent test of LMF theory for very strong hydrophobic interactions we also considered the association of repulsive-core Weeks-Chandler-Andersen (WCA) versions of both the Ar and fullerene solutes, where both solute-water and solute-solute VDW attractions are turned off. Understanding the changes in hydrophobic interactions resulting from VDW solute-solvent and solvent-solvent attractions has been the focus of much recent work (72)(73)(74)(75).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, an emerging body of work on prototypical hydrophobes such as methane, 20 argon, 48 and larger alkanes 44,4951 shows that solute–solvent attractive interactions can temper hydrophobic association. This suggests that “hydrophilic hydration and the intramolecular interactions are as important as, if not more important than, the hydrophobic effects” 17 in determining the structure of peptides and proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the alkane phase, to lowest order in solute density the contribution of solutesolute pairing to the excess chemical potential is 2ρ (a) wB2 [43,44], whereB 2 is the osmotic second virial coefficient. Quantum chemical calculations using B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) and the SMD continuum solvation model [45] shows that association is weaker in the solvent than in the gas-phase at 298 K. (The weakening of interaction in the alkane is analogous to the weakening of association between hydrophobes in water due to solute-water attractive interactions [32,46,47].) On this basis we can infer that |B 2 | < |B 2 | and thus dimerization ought to be inconsequential even in the alkane phase.…”
Section: Role Of Water Dimerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%