2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03380.x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular variability of group 1 and 5 grass pollen allergens between Pooideae species: implications for immunotherapy

Abstract: Major pollen allergens from distinct grass species bear both shared and species-restricted T and B cell immune epitopes. When compared with single extracts, a five grass pollen extract is thus more suitable for specific immunotherapy, as it contains a broader repertoire of the IgE epitopes to which patients are sensitized.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, different IgE clones recognized group 1 allergens found in extracts of pollen of different species to varying degrees. The fact that all extracts but mays (Z. mays) were recognized by at least one recombinant group 1-specific IgE argues against extensive variability of such allergens, as reported by others (53,54), in the different extracts used to establish the assays. It is notable that even a small pool of IgE Abs, such as the one tested in this study, could have the potential to provoke allergic responses against such a wide range of different grass species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, different IgE clones recognized group 1 allergens found in extracts of pollen of different species to varying degrees. The fact that all extracts but mays (Z. mays) were recognized by at least one recombinant group 1-specific IgE argues against extensive variability of such allergens, as reported by others (53,54), in the different extracts used to establish the assays. It is notable that even a small pool of IgE Abs, such as the one tested in this study, could have the potential to provoke allergic responses against such a wide range of different grass species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A study with GRA also reported crossreactivity at the T-cell level [47], but this used an artificial system of two generated T-cell lines, and not T cells isolated from allergic patients (as in reference [46]); therefore, T cells specific for minimally cross-reactive epitopes may have been missed. A mixed grass-pollen extract is more likely to ensure that a broad and well-balanced panel of critical major and minor allergenic epitopes is present, whereas a single grass-pollen preparation would likely restrict the repertoire of allergenic epitopes to which a patient becomes desensitized [36,42]. Further clinical trials are needed to clarify whether differences in the degree of sensitization toward epitopes correlate with differences in the ability of SLIT to elicit immunotolerance.…”
Section: Excipients (Inactive Drug Additives)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key difference between GRA and OA (apart from being 1-grass vs 5-grass-pollen preparations, respectively; see section 'Chemistry of the 5-grass-pollen tablet'), is that the former advocates perennial administration, unlike OA, which is only Chemistry of the 5-grass-pollen tablet In total, 13 groups of allergens that demonstrate significant IgE cross-reactivity have thus far been identified from pollen of the Pooideae subfamily of grasses [42]. Grass allergens belonging to groups 1 (glycoproteins) and 5 (non-glycosylated proteins) are well characterized and constitute the major allergens, which account for more than 80% of the allergenic potential of grasspollen [7,43].…”
Section: Excipients (Inactive Drug Additives)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Identification of the exact Pooideae member inducing primary sensitization may not be as important; both mixed grass pollen extracts and single representative species ( P. pratense pollen) have been argued to be effective [22,23,24,25]. …”
Section: Markers Of Genuine Sensitization To Major Pollen Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%