1990
DOI: 10.1089/jop.1990.6.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Weight Dependence of the Pharmacokinetic of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose in the Vitreous

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different experimental polymers have been studied, varying the molecular weight [96]. Researchers have tried to reduce intraocular degradation time, but as of today it is not yet available as a long-term vitreal substitute [97].…”
Section: Experimental Substitutesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different experimental polymers have been studied, varying the molecular weight [96]. Researchers have tried to reduce intraocular degradation time, but as of today it is not yet available as a long-term vitreal substitute [97].…”
Section: Experimental Substitutesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fernandez-Vigo et al injected a solution of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) (viscosity ~6000 cSt, M w = 86 kDa) in rabbits' eyes [177]: HPMC was completely eliminated from the vitreous cavity within 10 weeks after implantation and, therefore, the authors concluded in this first study that HPMC solutions are useful neither as a long-term vitreous substitute nor for sealing retinal holes in RRD due to the lack of tamponade effect. However, the excellent biocompatibility of HPMC was encouraging and the authors carried out another animal study in which they demonstrated that the residence time of HPMC in the vitreous cavity could be controlled by varying its molecular weight [178].…”
Section: Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, three other materials, HPMC [177,178], the cross-linked gelatins recently tested by Lai [152], and the gellan gum/hyaluronic acid gel proposed by Suri et al [159], exhibit interesting properties, but seem only useful for short-term vitreous substitution.…”
Section: Towards An Ideal Vitreous Substitutementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas multiple synthetic polymers that have been employed as potential vitreous substitute, such as poly(vinyl alcohol) and poly(glyceryl methacrylate), are usually with tunable mechanical properties and prolonged stability, these materials do not inherently interact with proteins or cells, leading to inferior biocompatibility and biodegradability . By contrast, natural polymers that have been tested as vitreous substitute, such as HA, collagen and cellulose derivatives, have the advantage of being nontoxic and biodegradable. However, these polymers are usually with weak mechanical strength and thus would be easily eliminated from the vitreous cavity shortly after implantation since the vitreous cavity is a semi‐open environment with constant fluid flows .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%