2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2019.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monetizing disinformation in the attention economy: The case of genetically modified organisms (GMOs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study carried out in six European countries (France, Germany, the UK, Italy, Poland, and Portugal) revealed that a third of the population in these countries would not use any type of food with GMOs [ 90 ]. More recently, several studies [ 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ] have continued to emphasize the importance of the presence or absence of GMOs as a factor in food choice and consumption. This assertion being true, which the present study brings as a novelty, is the fact that the strength of this attribute, although significant, is far less robust than health concerns, chosen as the most critical factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study carried out in six European countries (France, Germany, the UK, Italy, Poland, and Portugal) revealed that a third of the population in these countries would not use any type of food with GMOs [ 90 ]. More recently, several studies [ 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ] have continued to emphasize the importance of the presence or absence of GMOs as a factor in food choice and consumption. This assertion being true, which the present study brings as a novelty, is the fact that the strength of this attribute, although significant, is far less robust than health concerns, chosen as the most critical factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter strategy has been termed the ‘monetization of disinformation’ and may raise millions of dollars per year for groups that employ this strategy as a fundraising tool. A recent study analyzing 95,000 online articles found that those receiving the most attention appeared not in conventional media but were published by “a small group of alternative health and pro-conspiracy sites.” 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent publications, such as Winter and Jara (2015), Winter et al (2019), andReeves et al (2019), have attempted to provide more information about the process for risk assessment of pesticides conducted by regulatory agencies. Moreover, timely communications from regulatory agencies, such as BfR responding to reports of residues in food, German beer, or urine (BfR, 2016(BfR, , 2017, provide helpful information from what should be a trustworthy source in the face of widespread social media communications about food and agriculture (Ryan et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%