Monitoring and Management of Pyrethroid Resistance in the Tobacco Budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Oklahoma

Plapp, Frederick W.; Jackman, John A.; Campanhola, Clayton; Frisbie, R. E.; Graves, J. B.; Luttrell, R. G.; Kitten, W. F.; Wall, M. L.

doi:10.1093/jee/83.2.335

Cited by 34 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1). A similar pattern was observed for this species in vial test data reported in Arkansas, MS, and Texas from 1986 through 1988 (Plapp et al 1990b). Vial test data indicate a somewhat similar, though much less regular and dramatic pattern for Louisiana bollworm populations during the 1988 through 1999 growing seasons (Fig.…”

supporting

confidence: 79%

“…In addition, we assumed that adult survival rates were perfectly correlated with larval survival rates (Gage and HatÞeld 1989, Roush and Luttrell 1989, Plapp et al 1990a, Plapp et al 1990b.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…THE DEVELOPMENT OF organochlorine, organophosphate, and carbamate resistance in the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (Sparks 1981, Wolfenbarger et al 1981, its status as a major cotton pest, Gossypium hirsutum (L.) (Luttrell 1994), and reports of increased pyrethroid tolerance in 1986 in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas (Plapp et al 1987, Roush and Luttrell 1987, Leonard et al 1988, Plapp et al 1990b) stimulated over a decadeÕs worth of research on the nature of pyrethroid resistance in this species. Resistance is now widespread in midsouth populations and has eliminated pyrethroids as an effective control (Bagwell et al 2000).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Use of Mathematical Models to Estimate Characteristics of Pyrethroid Resistance in Tobacco Budworm and Bollworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Field Populations

Livingston

Carlson

Fackler

2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Genetic models have been used to examine the evolution of insecticide resistance in pest species subject to data and assumptions regarding genetic, biological, and operational parameters. We used time-series data on pyrethroid tolerance and simple genetic models to estimate underlying genetic and biological parameters associated with resistance evolution in tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (F.), and bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), Louisiana field populations. Assuming pyrethroid resistance is conferred by one gene at one locus in both species, inheritance of pyrethroid resistance was partially dominant in the tobacco budworm and partially recessive in the bollworm. Relative fitness estimates indicated that fitness costs associated with resistance selected against resistance alleles in the absence of selection pressure in the tobacco budworm, but not in the bollworm. In addition, relative fitness estimates obtained using the indirect method outlined in this study were similar in magnitude to estimates obtained using traditional direct approaches.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 79%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Use of Mathematical Models to Estimate Characteristics of Pyrethroid Resistance in Tobacco Budworm and Bollworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Field Populations

Livingston

Carlson

Fackler

2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A cross much of the U.S. cotton belt , broad‐spectrum insecticides are applied early in the growing season to protect fruiting forms from insect pests such as the boll weevil ( Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman) and the tobacco budworm [ Heliothis virescens (Fabricius)] (Mann et al, 1997). These applications not only increase production costs and environmental contamination, but also increase the likelihood of insecticide resistance development (Plapp et al, 1990) and decrease the populations of beneficial arthropods (House et al, 1985). In the southeastern region of the U.S. Cotton Belt, the Boll Weevil Eradication Program has virtually eliminated A grandis as an economic insect pest.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatial Yield Distribution in Cotton Following Early‐Season Floral Bud Removal

Bednarz

Roberts

2001

Crop Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

sions are based on several factors, including insect densities, cultivar/technology utilization, weather, equipment, A better understanding of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) comand farm size (Mi et al., 1998). Economic thresholds, pensatory growth after loss of early-season floral buds requires an assessment of the actual patterns of spatial yield distribution in dam-however, rarely consider plant compensation for loss of aged and undamaged plants. This study was conducted to determine early-season floral buds as part of the model. Inclusion if spatial yield distribution or yield components are altered in cotton of plant compensation in economic injury levels would in response to removal of early-season floral buds. Beginning with the raise treatment thresholds, thereby reducing insecticide second week of squaring, floral buds were removed by hand for one, applications and the costs, contamination, and resistwo, or three consecutive weeks. At 90 d after planting, plant height, tance development related to them. Prior to inclusion leaf area index, main stem node number, fruit present, total fruiting in an economic injury level, however, the ability of cotpositions, and dry weights were measured. The contribution to total ton to compensate for loss of early-season floral buds yield from each fruiting position was determined at crop maturity.must be fully documented. Results from this study show the lowest level of floral bud removal

show abstract

“…In early trials, pheromone lures were used to attract male moths, and males were then tested for resistance by topical application of pesticide solutions of different concentrations [84]. An alternative approach is the use of insecticide-treated vials to test males attracted to pheromone traps [85]. In a refinement of this approach, males were trapped in sticky traps baited with pheromone, and topical applications of pesticide solutions were made without removing the males from the glue in the trap [86,87].…”

Section: Insecticide Resistancementioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Semiochemicals in Integrated Pest Management Programs

Bjostad

Hibbard

Cranshaw

1993

ACS Symposium Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chemical communication is important in the life cycles of many insect species, principally for the location of mates and food. Structural identification and synthesis has been carried out for many semiochemicals, and a number of techniques have been developed to use these compounds as components of integrated pest management (IPM) programs. Semiochemicals have two main uses in IPM programs: monitoring insect pest populations and preventing agricultural damage by interfering with insect behavior. Pheromones are perhaps the most widely exploited semiochemicals at present, but recent efforts have extended increasingly to the identification and use of compounds involved in interspecific exchange of information as well.The use of semiochemicals to manipulate insect behavior has proved to be one of the most useful components of integrated pest management (IPM) programs. Semiochemicals are compounds that are emitted or displayed by one organism and that affect the behavior of another organism [/]. Perhaps the most important semiochemicals used by insects are those involved in locating mates and food, and at present these are the kinds of semiochemicals most widely exploited for insect control. Semiochemicals with many other kinds of ecological roles have also been characterized in insects, such as compounds that function as warnings, or compounds that mediate the collective activity of many partners in completing large tasks. A number of major reviews of the use of semiochemicals in IPM programs have appeared [7][8][9], as well as a critical review of semiochemical utility in general [10], An extensive list of companies that offer semiochemical lures, traps designed for semiochemical monitoring, and commercial systems for behavioral pest control has been compiled by Inscoe [11].Practical applications of semiochemicals in agriculture fall into two main categories, population monitoring and behavioral pest control. The main use at present is in monitoring insect pests with traps baited with semiochemicals, as a part of making decisions about pesticide application or other control techniques. A second use of semiochemicals is the direct prevention of insect damage by a variety of techniques, including the placement of a large number of semiochemical sources that disrupt the behavior of the insects, mass trapping, attracticides (insecticide lures), and enhancement of parasitoid activity.

show abstract

Monitoring and Management of Pyrethroid Resistance in the Tobacco Budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Oklahoma

Cited by 34 publications

References 0 publications

Use of Mathematical Models to Estimate Characteristics of Pyrethroid Resistance in Tobacco Budworm and Bollworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Field Populations

Use of Mathematical Models to Estimate Characteristics of Pyrethroid Resistance in Tobacco Budworm and Bollworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Field Populations

Spatial Yield Distribution in Cotton Following Early‐Season Floral Bud Removal

Application of Semiochemicals in Integrated Pest Management Programs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About