2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0266467417000323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring fruit-feeding butterfly assemblages in two vertical strata in seasonal Atlantic Forest: temporal species turnover is lower in the canopy

Abstract: Abstract:To address how seasonality affects the richness and abundance of tropical insects, we compared the canopy and understorey communities of fruit-feeding butterflies in a seasonal Atlantic forest in south-eastern Brazil. Butterflies were sampled over 1 y using a standardized design with baited traps. A total of 2047 individuals in 69 species were recorded (1415 in the canopy, 632 in the understorey). Clear differences were found between canopy and understorey, with significantly higher butterfly abundanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
21
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the present study, species richness was not different between strata, while in most previous studies the understory was richer than the canopy [16,22,23,32,43,44]. Still, in one study in the Amazonian forest [25] and another in the Atlantic Forest [45], the opposite was recorded, with greater fruit-feeding butterfly species richness in the canopy than in the understory. Given these idiosyncrasies one must be cautious in trying to identify a mechanism behind patterns that appear from a limited number of studies in the Atlantic Forest.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the present study, species richness was not different between strata, while in most previous studies the understory was richer than the canopy [16,22,23,32,43,44]. Still, in one study in the Amazonian forest [25] and another in the Atlantic Forest [45], the opposite was recorded, with greater fruit-feeding butterfly species richness in the canopy than in the understory. Given these idiosyncrasies one must be cautious in trying to identify a mechanism behind patterns that appear from a limited number of studies in the Atlantic Forest.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…The present results showed higher abundance in the understory as found in other tropical forests [16,22,23,32,44]. A distinct pattern was found in a study carried out in an area of montane Atlantic Forest where higher abundances of fruit-feeding butterflies were observed in the canopy [45]. In that case, the greater abundance in the canopy was explained by the difference in the temperature between strata (due to a combination of altitude and latitude).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Forest cover is critical to the maintenance of specific microclimate conditions, the importance of which increases in seasonal areas (Horner‐Devine et al, ). Some clades of fruit‐feeding species are strictly associated with forest‐shaded habitats and forage in specific forest vertical strata (DeVries, Murray, & Lande, ; Ribeiro & Freitas, ; Santos, Iserhard, Carreira, & Freitas, ). Fleshy fruits and organic matter, whose accumulation depends on the presence of forest cover, are important food sources for the adults of fruit‐feeding species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are fast flyers, usually associated with the forest canopy (Ribeiro & Freitas ; Santos et al . ), making them difficult to observe in the field. Therefore, little is known about their biology and behaviour (Pyrcz & Neild ), and the immature stages of only a few species have been described (Beccaloni et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most species, the dorsal surface of the wing is a dark brown ground colour with shining blue, purple, or green patches, and the ventral surface is cryptically patterned, resembling dry leaves when perching with wings closed. They are fast flyers, usually associated with the forest canopy (Ribeiro & Freitas 2012;Santos et al 2017), making them difficult to observe in the field. Therefore, little is known about their biology and behaviour (Pyrcz & Neild 1996), and the immature stages of only a few species have been described (Beccaloni et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%