2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl087234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of Dust Devil Tracks Around the InSight Landing Site, Mars, and Comparison With In Situ Atmospheric Data

Abstract: The NASA InSight mission on Mars is a unique opportunity to study atmospheric processes both from orbit and in situ observations. We use post-landing high-resolution satellite images to monitor dust devil activity during the first 8 months of the mission. We perform mapping and semiautomatic detection of newly formed dust devil tracks and analyze their characteristics (sizes, azimuths, distances, and directions of motion). We find a large number of tracks appearing shortly after landing, followed by a signific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
60
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
11
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is clearly much larger than the minimum formation rate of 0.04–0.06 tracks per sol per km 2 found by Perrin et al. (2020), even considering the very exceptional period of intense dust devil activity at the beginning of the InSight mission (i.e., 0.68 tracks/sol/km 2 ). Actually, this “threshold” value of 1 ms −1 is chosen to be permissive to detect enough tracks to form a reasonable statistics to compare to images in Perrin et al.…”
Section: Comparison With Large‐eddy Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is clearly much larger than the minimum formation rate of 0.04–0.06 tracks per sol per km 2 found by Perrin et al. (2020), even considering the very exceptional period of intense dust devil activity at the beginning of the InSight mission (i.e., 0.68 tracks/sol/km 2 ). Actually, this “threshold” value of 1 ms −1 is chosen to be permissive to detect enough tracks to form a reasonable statistics to compare to images in Perrin et al.…”
Section: Comparison With Large‐eddy Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Although no visible dust devils have been detected by the InSight cameras (Banfield et al., 2020), numerous fresh tracks were detected from orbit in the region of the InSight landing site (Perrin et al., 2020), sometimes corresponding to tracks identified by InSight cameras (Banerdt et al. (2020) and Charalambous et al., in revision for this issue).…”
Section: Comparison With Large‐eddy Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations