2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring online cutting tool wear using low-cost technique and user-friendly GUI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Three feature parameters of rake face were obtained by the calculation method in reference [23]. After precise positioning the flank wear boundary, the image was divided into B zone, N zone and C zone, the seven eigenvalues were measured using the microscope [24]. The feature extraction and feature measurement tool's image is shown in Figure 12.…”
Section: Figure 5 Measurement Set Mounted On the Htc2550hsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three feature parameters of rake face were obtained by the calculation method in reference [23]. After precise positioning the flank wear boundary, the image was divided into B zone, N zone and C zone, the seven eigenvalues were measured using the microscope [24]. The feature extraction and feature measurement tool's image is shown in Figure 12.…”
Section: Figure 5 Measurement Set Mounted On the Htc2550hsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These disturbances can be compensated in part, for instance by employing temperature compensation and a compensation of tool wear by respective measurements or predictions [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. However, in order to guarantee deviations from the desired shape below 1 μm, shape measurements are still required.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, wet cutting machining conditions is also not recommended for this method. Indirect method uses various type of signals from the sensors used or installed such as temperature, vibrations, cutting forces, acoustic emission, current in electric motor, sound and other measurable elements [5]. In indirect method, common signal feature (SF) such as standard deviation, kurtosis, variance, maximum amplitude, average, I-kaz TM and etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%