2019
DOI: 10.1002/bkcs.11883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring Plant Moisture Content Using an Induction Coil Sensor

Abstract: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 D), and 1.917–1.935 GHz (Fig. 1 E), reduced and shifted SWR were observed for the experimental vessel, probably due to the presence of stem water and magnetic particles in the stem water flow that changed the RF characteristics of the coil probe [ 11 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 D), and 1.917–1.935 GHz (Fig. 1 E), reduced and shifted SWR were observed for the experimental vessel, probably due to the presence of stem water and magnetic particles in the stem water flow that changed the RF characteristics of the coil probe [ 11 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary experiments with different plant species [ 11 ] indicated that electrical factors, such as the diameter and winding number of the coil probe, significantly affect the measurement results. Higher frequency ranges (i.e., 2.0–4.0 GHz) produced noticeable SWR variation post-watering (Additional file 3 ), whereas frequencies < 1.0 GHz were not used because of the increased noise (Additional file 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation