Sport, Recovery, and Performance 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315268149-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring the recovery-stress state in athletes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since recovery is a highly individual process and recovery strategies have to match an individual's specific needs (Pelka et al, 2017b ; Heidari et al, 2018 ), missing intervention effects of the laboratory study can also be explained. Optimal short-term recovery can only be achieved when recovery activities are consciously planned according to situational and environmental needs (Pelka and Kellmann, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since recovery is a highly individual process and recovery strategies have to match an individual's specific needs (Pelka et al, 2017b ; Heidari et al, 2018 ), missing intervention effects of the laboratory study can also be explained. Optimal short-term recovery can only be achieved when recovery activities are consciously planned according to situational and environmental needs (Pelka and Kellmann, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 A regular monitoring of sleep behaviour (objective as well as subjective assessment) and the assessment of training parameters and recovery-stress responses are therefore important in elite sports. 48 On the one hand, this allows for detecting irregularities (e.g., due to travel or illness) and deriving interventions at an early stage. On the other hand, implementation of recovery modalities and sleep management strategies can be evaluated.…”
Section: Implications and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another modification has been reported by Yelling et al (2002) who have illustrated the verbal and numerical rating scale with pictorial images of exertion. However, the recovery-stress continuum is multi-dimensional and cannot be simplified by assessing only the exertion or the absence thereof (Kellmann, 2010; Heidari et al, 2018). While it is recommended to capture different aspects of recovery and stress (e.g., mood, emotional well-being), it is doubtful whether existing questionnaires which were developed and validated among adults can be transferred to be used on younger athletes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%