1991
DOI: 10.1021/j100177a062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mononuclear rhenium carbonyls on magnesia: characterization of the metal-support interface by extended x-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extended X‐ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) results characterizing 1 (measured at the Au L III edge, 11 919 eV, Table 2), show that in the surface complex the gold center was also bonded to two oxygen atoms. These are inferred to be part of the MgO surface (although the exact bonding sites are unknown), because the AuO separation was found to be 2.16 Å (vs. 2.08 Å in 2 21), typical of MO bonding distances in other zeolite‐ and oxide‐supported mononuclear metal complexes (e.g., [Rh(CO) 2 {OAl}{OSi}] (supported on highly dealuminated zeolite Y), 2.15 Å;3b [Ru(CO) 2 {OAl} 2 ] (on γ‐Al 2 O 3 ), 2.17 Å;22 and [Re(CO) 3 {OMg}{HOMg} 2 ] (on MgO), 2.13 Å3a, 23). Another Au–O contribution in the EXAFS spectrum of 1 was found at a nonbonding distance of 2.85 Å (with a coordination number of 0.9), along with another (weak) contribution tentatively identified as Au–Mg ( N =0.9, 2.72 Å).…”
Section: Infrared Spectra Representing Samples 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Extended X‐ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) results characterizing 1 (measured at the Au L III edge, 11 919 eV, Table 2), show that in the surface complex the gold center was also bonded to two oxygen atoms. These are inferred to be part of the MgO surface (although the exact bonding sites are unknown), because the AuO separation was found to be 2.16 Å (vs. 2.08 Å in 2 21), typical of MO bonding distances in other zeolite‐ and oxide‐supported mononuclear metal complexes (e.g., [Rh(CO) 2 {OAl}{OSi}] (supported on highly dealuminated zeolite Y), 2.15 Å;3b [Ru(CO) 2 {OAl} 2 ] (on γ‐Al 2 O 3 ), 2.17 Å;22 and [Re(CO) 3 {OMg}{HOMg} 2 ] (on MgO), 2.13 Å3a, 23). Another Au–O contribution in the EXAFS spectrum of 1 was found at a nonbonding distance of 2.85 Å (with a coordination number of 0.9), along with another (weak) contribution tentatively identified as Au–Mg ( N =0.9, 2.72 Å).…”
Section: Infrared Spectra Representing Samples 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Note that this bond distance is slightly shorter than those observed by EXAFS for Ir-O bonds in iridium particles deposited on metal oxides [52]. This relatively short metal-oxygen distance may be explained by the interaction of metal atoms with small positive charges with oxygens of the interface [53,54].…”
Section: Xas (X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy)mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…[13,19] The data consistently indicate IrÀO support distances of approximately 98 www.chemcatchem.org 2.1 , matching typical IrÀO bonding distances. [36,37] Such results are the norm for Group 8 metal carbonyl complexes on oxides [13,14,23,[26][27][28][32][33][34] and zeolites; [9,[10][11][12]19] the nearness of the Ir atom to the support implies a significant distortion of the position of the CO ligands from those in isolated iridium carbonyl clusters.…”
Section: Determination Of Structures Of Supported Iridium Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%