2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.101.043846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monopole-antimonopole instability in non-Hermitian coupled waveguides

Abstract: A non-Hermitian coupled waveguide system with periodically varying parameters, in which the Berry curvature is analogous to a hyperbolic magnetic monopole or antimonopole, is investigated. It is shown to have a purely imaginary Berry connection, and is consequently influenced by a geometric multiplier. It is possible for this multiplier to induce net gain or loss in the system, corresponding to the existence of the antimonopole or monopole in parameter space, respectively. For the right choice of parameters, t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Underlying these effects are fundamental differences between Hermitian and non-Hermitian Hamiltonians; this includes that eigenstates can coalesce and become defective at exceptional points, that the left and right eigenfunctions will typically be different from each other, and that the eigenenergies can become complex [13,26]. One important consequence of these differences is that the Berry phase will, in general, become complex-instead of real-valued, implying that the amplitude as well as the phase of a state will vary under adiabatic dynam-ical evolution [4][5][6][7][28][29][30][31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Underlying these effects are fundamental differences between Hermitian and non-Hermitian Hamiltonians; this includes that eigenstates can coalesce and become defective at exceptional points, that the left and right eigenfunctions will typically be different from each other, and that the eigenenergies can become complex [13,26]. One important consequence of these differences is that the Berry phase will, in general, become complex-instead of real-valued, implying that the amplitude as well as the phase of a state will vary under adiabatic dynam-ical evolution [4][5][6][7][28][29][30][31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) are all purely imaginary, and they diverge as we approach the PT -symmetry breaking transition, where adiabaticity breaks down. (Analytical expressions of the Berry connections and associated Berry curvatures are derived in the Supplemental Material, and can be interpreted in terms of a complex hyperbolic pseudo-magnetic monopole in parameter space [11,31].) This in turn means that the only non-vanishing part of the non-Hermitian Berry phase (Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the concept of parity-time (PT ) symmetry has attracted extensive research interest in different systems [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. Interestingly, Hamiltonians that are symmetric under the combined operation of parity and time reversal transformation (PT symmetric operators) can have a real spectrum even though the operators are non-Hermitian [54][55][56].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%