2022
DOI: 10.1111/sjoe.12457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monopsonistic competition, trade, and the profit share*

Abstract: I present a tractable international trade model of monopsonistic competition and heterogeneous firms, in which markups and markdowns are increasing with the size of firms. The model sheds new light on the effects of trade on the aggregate profit share. In a standard model with a Pareto distribution of firm characteristics, the profit share is constant; by augmenting the model with the assumption of monopsonistic competition, trade can increase the profit share under reasonable assumptions for the parameter val… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature acknowledges the rarity of such an extreme market scenario but provides both theoretical explanations for the emergence of considerable market power wielded by firms and a rigorous quantitative assessment of the magnitude of such monopsony power. For a small (yet far from complete) sample of the voluminous body of work on imperfect competition in labor markets, see the studies by Burdett and Mortensen (1998), Falch and Strom (2007), and Macedoni (2022), and the three review articles Boal and Ransom (1997) and Manning (2011Manning ( , 2021, along with the references therein. A common explanation for presence of monopsony power is related to the existence of search and matching frictions; see Rogerson et al (2005) for a comprehensive survey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature acknowledges the rarity of such an extreme market scenario but provides both theoretical explanations for the emergence of considerable market power wielded by firms and a rigorous quantitative assessment of the magnitude of such monopsony power. For a small (yet far from complete) sample of the voluminous body of work on imperfect competition in labor markets, see the studies by Burdett and Mortensen (1998), Falch and Strom (2007), and Macedoni (2022), and the three review articles Boal and Ransom (1997) and Manning (2011Manning ( , 2021, along with the references therein. A common explanation for presence of monopsony power is related to the existence of search and matching frictions; see Rogerson et al (2005) for a comprehensive survey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%