2018
DOI: 10.4314/sokjvs.v16i2.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monosodium glutamate-induced changes on plasma markers of pancreatic function in adult male Wistar rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results were in agreement withSeiva et al (2012);Abdulsalam et al (2018) andMoen et al (2020) who reported significant elevation in the levels of lipase and amylase enzymes in the MSG-treated group compared to the control group.Contrary to the present study,Yadav et al. (2010) showed that MSG induced a dosedependent inhibitory effect on gastrointestinal alpha-amylase enzyme activity.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The current results were in agreement withSeiva et al (2012);Abdulsalam et al (2018) andMoen et al (2020) who reported significant elevation in the levels of lipase and amylase enzymes in the MSG-treated group compared to the control group.Contrary to the present study,Yadav et al. (2010) showed that MSG induced a dosedependent inhibitory effect on gastrointestinal alpha-amylase enzyme activity.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…On contrary, Abdulsalam et al (2018) revealed that no histopathological changes in β-islets cells of Langerhans and only congestion of blood vessels of the pancreas in both MSG-treated and non-MSG-control rats were observed.…”
Section: Regardingmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in agreement with the findings reported in similar studies. Abdulsalam et al (2018) also observed no changes in insulin levels or glucose tolerance during MSG supplementation. They argue that the functional blood glucose impairment may require a second hit or a separate factor for susceptibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%