2006
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.55041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Montana gray wolf conservation and management plan : 2005 annual report

Abstract: alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves. Ecology 86:3387-3397. Creel S & Winnie J 2005. Responses of elk herd size to fine-scale spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves. Animal Behaviour 69:1181-1189.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our model, using demographic and pack size parameters from northwestern Montana, yielded a deterministic population growth rate of 1.23 compared to the observed growth rate of 1.22 in Montana (Sime et al ). The stochastic growth rate for the model that included immigration was 1.18 ± 0.01 and 1.13 ± 0.03 for simulations excluding immigration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our model, using demographic and pack size parameters from northwestern Montana, yielded a deterministic population growth rate of 1.23 compared to the observed growth rate of 1.22 in Montana (Sime et al ). The stochastic growth rate for the model that included immigration was 1.18 ± 0.01 and 1.13 ± 0.03 for simulations excluding immigration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Our model, using demographic and pack size parameters from northwestern Montana, yielded a deterministic population growth rate of 1.23 compared to the observed growth rate of 1.22 in Montana (Sime et al 2011). The Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…181-191), which characterized an established population as one in which a wolf pair produces pups each year. Saint Mary had a low wolf population; although wolves have attempted to recolonize Saint Mary since the 1980s, no breeding pair or pack of wolves occurred there during our study (Sime et al 2010), but wolves were observed occasionally passing through the area. Waterton had a moderate and variable wolf population; wolves were confirmed denning in WLNP in 1992 (Fox and Van Tieghem 1994) and have denned in that park consistently since then.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We characterized the North Fork as having a high wolf population. During our study, North Fork wolves averaged 38 individuals in two packs that produced multiple litters (Sime et al 2010). These wolf population levels provided a very coarse measure of wolf activity in the three valleys.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated the number of wolves and approximate spatial distribution of each pack annually based on repeated aerial‐survey and ground monitoring efforts. We obtained data from Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks annual reports (http://fwp.mt.gov/fishAndWildlife/management/wolf/default.html; Sime et al , , , 2011), which represented minimum counts rather than true population estimates. We assumed all packs were detected because the area is intensively monitored for wolf activity by multiple agencies as well as landowners.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%