1972
DOI: 10.2172/4657234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo Calculations of the Response Functions of Bonner Ball Neutron Detectors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1973
1973
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) the sizes of the gaps between slabs, unavoidably introduced in the configurations, (2) the positions of the detectors, (3) the detector count rate statistics and calibrations, (4) the reactor power determinations, and (5) the effects of the exposure of the configurations to the weather. Of these, the uncertainty due to the weather is the least understood and probably beyond simple estimation.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experlmental Errors 'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) the sizes of the gaps between slabs, unavoidably introduced in the configurations, (2) the positions of the detectors, (3) the detector count rate statistics and calibrations, (4) the reactor power determinations, and (5) the effects of the exposure of the configurations to the weather. Of these, the uncertainty due to the weather is the least understood and probably beyond simple estimation.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experlmental Errors 'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.26 (0) 5.87 (2) 1.19 (0) 1.17 (0) 5.60 (2) 4.88 (2) 4.27 (2) . 1.12 (0) (2) 3.69 (2) 4.77 (2) 6.03 (2) 7.38 (2) 8.91 (2) 1.00 (3) I w…”
Section: (0)unclassified
“…Bonner ball experimental results are predicted analytically by folding a calculated neutron spectrum with the Bonner ball response functions determined by Maerker et al ' and by C. E. Burgart et al. 2 The thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs) used for the gamma-ray deposition measurements consisted of CaF 2 :Mn chips purchased from the Harshaw Chemical Company. They were 0.3175 cm on a side and approximately 0.089 cm thick.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%