2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-8043(00)00366-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo determination of full energy peak efficiency for a HPGe detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are also consistent with what has been reported in a number of studies [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. It should be noted that, whereas increased attenuation in a thicker dead layer is negligible for higher photon energies, higher energies are nevertheless affected by an increase in dead layer as this also results in a decrease of the sensitive volume of the crystal.…”
Section: Dead Layersupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are also consistent with what has been reported in a number of studies [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. It should be noted that, whereas increased attenuation in a thicker dead layer is negligible for higher photon energies, higher energies are nevertheless affected by an increase in dead layer as this also results in a decrease of the sensitive volume of the crystal.…”
Section: Dead Layersupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Hence, this thickness is often adjusted in the model to match Monte Carlo calculated efficiencies with experimental ones [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Recently, Huy et al [20] have also presented results indicating that the dead layer thickness can increase with time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the detector simulation, the crystal and its surrounding materials were considered [5][6][7]. Fig.…”
Section: Detector Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well known to other nuclear applications from early 1904s, the implementation of Monte Carlo methods have recently been extended to the field of detector design and calibration in (natural) g-ray spectrometry with NaI(Tl) and BGO scintillators [6,7] and has facilitated the calibration of Ge semiconductor detectors [8] and assessment of the Ge detector efficiency curve [9]. Monte Carlo simulations have furthermore been instrumental for determination of spatial dependence [10] and full-energy peak efficiency ( [11] and references therein). Simulations have indicated good agreement when compared to empirical and semiempirical efficiency fittings for Ge detectors [12,13] and were validated for efficiency calculations of various source-detector geometries and source shapes [14] and were also deployed for construction of various detector models for efficiency interpolation in g-ray spectrometry [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%