1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(199905)20:7<665::aid-jcc2>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo-MST: New strategy for representation of solvent configurational space in solution

Abstract: A new procedure for the representation of the configurational space of solutes in solution is presented. The method is based on the combination of standard Monte Carlo techniques with the continuum model developed by the Pisa group in its semiclassical version, which was developed by our group. The suitability of the method for exploring the configurational space of chemical systems in solution has been tested by analyzing the dimers of formic acid, imidazole, and benzene, as well as the interaction between th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(13), where {Q i0} stands for the point charges (typically located at the N ′ nuclei) representing the solute charge distribution in the gas phase and {q jsol} denotes the point charges located at surface elements (j=1,… M ) representing the final solvent reaction field. We previously showed that the best results are obtained when the set {Q i0} is determined by fitting to the QM electrostatic potential and field at the solute cavity surface (ESPF charges61–64). However, reasonable results are also obtained by using electrostatic fitted charges (ESP or RESP) identical to those used in force‐field calculations (see below).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13), where {Q i0} stands for the point charges (typically located at the N ′ nuclei) representing the solute charge distribution in the gas phase and {q jsol} denotes the point charges located at surface elements (j=1,… M ) representing the final solvent reaction field. We previously showed that the best results are obtained when the set {Q i0} is determined by fitting to the QM electrostatic potential and field at the solute cavity surface (ESPF charges61–64). However, reasonable results are also obtained by using electrostatic fitted charges (ESP or RESP) identical to those used in force‐field calculations (see below).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Accordingly, configurations of the system are randomly generated by translating and rotating one monomer with respect to the other. The mean energy (eq 4) is then computed and the configuration is accepted or rejected following the Metropolis rules.…”
Section: Quantum Mechanical Gas-phase Calculations Preliminary Montementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 According to Génin et al 3 who performed an infrared and Raman spectroscopic study of aqueous solutions of acetic acid, at low concentrations the acid is largely a hydrated monomer. As acid concentration increases, the hydrated monomer is gradually replaced by a hydrated linear dimer and then by the cyclic dimer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%