2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2008.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo simulation of energy loss of electrons backscattered from solid surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe a very good qualitative as well as quantitative agreement, better than the agreement obtained with the models in Ref. [14][15][16]. The first loss peak is almost perfectly modeled for all three energies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We observe a very good qualitative as well as quantitative agreement, better than the agreement obtained with the models in Ref. [14][15][16]. The first loss peak is almost perfectly modeled for all three energies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Unfortunately, until now the software is not available and the equations are quite complex. Novák has used [16] a semiclassical expression derived by Li et al [17] for the position dependent differential inelastic cross section. Although simulated spectra systematically underestimated experimental results, the agreement is quite good.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An improved model with the correct asymptotic properties valid over all angular orientations of the electron trajectory is available 96 but with the cost of a substantial increase in computation. 97 Although a separation of bulk and surface losses is not strictly correct, the KWT model offers a first approximation to the effect of surface losses upon the DCS. Specifically, the terms including Im À1=eðx; kÞ f grepresent energy losses to bulk excitations whereas those including Im À1=½eðx; kÞ f þ1g represent energy losses to surface excitations.…”
Section: B Near Surface Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of surface excitations implies a modification of the sampling algorithm in the vicinity of the surface (typically 15 Å above and below the surface), as schematically shown in Figure 1. Technical details on the implementation of the algorithm for the simulation of surface energy losses can be found elsewhere in great detail [ 30,31,50]. Here the focus is on the effect of surface excitations on the reflection-electron-energy-loss spectrum (REELS).…”
Section: Monte-carlo Simulation Of Electron Energy-loss Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%