Monte-Carlo simulation of investment integrity and value for power-plants with carbon-capture

Lorenzo, Giuseppina Di; Pilidis, Pericles; Witton, John; Probert, Douglas

doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.010

Cited by 40 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, the comparison between the routes indicated that the Atlantic Ocean was a more favourable environment for the Capital, maintenance and installation costs of the analysed technologies (Dimopoulos et al, 2006;Theotokatos and Livanos 2013;Di Lorenzo et al, 2012;Al-Sulaiman and Yilbas, 2015;Saeidi et al, 2013). installation of the VAWTs.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Techno economic and environmental assessment of wind assisted marine propulsion systems

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Techno economic and environmental assessment of wind assisted marine propulsion systems

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This reflects a difficulty inherent to any new technology: a lack of standardized reporting methods and units and diversity of currencies used (Di Lorenzo et al. ). As mentioned previously, broader and more wide‐ranging studies, such as the IPCC special report on CCS, may help to set standards.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Carbon Capture and Storage Assessment Methods

Choptiany

Pelot

Sherren

2014

J of Industrial Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Climate change is one of the most serious threats facing humankind. Mitigating climate change will require a suite of actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a new technology aimed at mitigating climate change by capturing and storing carbon dioxide, typically in deep geological reservoirs. CCS has risks characteristic of new technologies, as well as risks unique to this technology and its application. Large‐scale CCS decision making is complex, encompassing environmental, social, and economic considerations and requiring the risks to be taken into consideration. CCS projects have been cancelled as a result of inadequate assessments of risks. To date, studies assessing CCS have been limited mostly to environmental, social, and economic fields in isolation from each other, predominantly using life cycle assessments (LCAs), cost benefit analyses (CBAs), or surveys of public perception. LCAs, CBAs, and surveys of public perception all have limitations for assessing difficult multifaceted problems. Incompatibilities across CCS assessment methods have hindered the comparison of the results across these single‐discipline studies and limited the possibility of drawing broader conclusions about CCS development. More standardization across assessment methods, study assumptions, functional units, and assessment criteria for CCS could be beneficial to the integration of multiple study results. We propose a set of criteria, which decision analysts could use to develop CCS‐project–specific criteria lists in order to comprehensively assess a CCS project's viability. This list was created by determining the frequency of use of each criterion in recent studies, with a focus on their use across disciplines.

show abstract

“…One of the most effective methods of the risk level assessment is the Monte Carlo method, which is widely used in reference literature for analyses of power generation systems integrated with CO 2 separation installations. Example analyses are the subject of papers [29][30][31][32].…”

Section: Risk Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

An analysis of the investment risk related to the integration of a supercritical coal-fired combined heat and power plant with an absorption installation for CO 2 separation

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Monte-Carlo simulation of investment integrity and value for power-plants with carbon-capture

Cited by 40 publications

References 26 publications

Techno economic and environmental assessment of wind assisted marine propulsion systems

Techno economic and environmental assessment of wind assisted marine propulsion systems

An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Carbon Capture and Storage Assessment Methods

An analysis of the investment risk related to the integration of a supercritical coal-fired combined heat and power plant with an absorption installation for CO 2 separation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About