1983
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4655(83)90030-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte-Carlo simulation of pure U(N) and SU(N) lattice gauge theories with fundamental and adjoint couplings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Z 2 monopole density should vanish in the continuum limit g 2 → 0. This happens, however, in different ways, depending on the dimensions d or the direction along which such limit is taken in the β F − β A plane, and has been the subject of intense investigations in the pioneering years of lattice gauge theories [38,[42][43][44][45][46][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. For the SU (2) − SO (3) case considered here the resulting phase diagrams in d = 3 and 4 are sketched in Figs theory has no phase transition; apart from the roughening transition [48], the corresponding phase diagram should therefore be free of any bulk effects, including crossovers.…”
Section: A Action and Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Z 2 monopole density should vanish in the continuum limit g 2 → 0. This happens, however, in different ways, depending on the dimensions d or the direction along which such limit is taken in the β F − β A plane, and has been the subject of intense investigations in the pioneering years of lattice gauge theories [38,[42][43][44][45][46][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. For the SU (2) − SO (3) case considered here the resulting phase diagrams in d = 3 and 4 are sketched in Figs theory has no phase transition; apart from the roughening transition [48], the corresponding phase diagram should therefore be free of any bulk effects, including crossovers.…”
Section: A Action and Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a is the (dimensionful) lattice spacing and U P denotes the 1 × 1 plaquette; all results can be easily generalized to different boundary conditions. For higher groups SU (N ) the general picture should not change dramatically [29,[42][43][44][45][46]. However, other representations than just the fundamental and adjoint are allowed.…”
Section: Setup a Action And Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to a substantial reduction of cut-off effects in a variety of asymptotically free field theories, ranging from the 2-d O(3) model to QCD. A different approach uses mixed fundamental-adjoint actions to reduce cut-off effects without extending the space-time extent of the operators beyond a single plaquette, and thus with only a moderate increase of the computational cost [10][11][12][13]. In [14,15] the…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%