2020
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/15/05/p05016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte-Carlo simulations of the full-energy-peak efficiency for a broad-energy germanium detector—a comparison between GEANT4 and FLUKA

Abstract: The detection efficiency of a broad-energy germanium detector was determined empirically and compared to predictions by the Monte-Carlo software GEANT4 and FLUKA . The considered source geometries were point-like, filter paper and a water beaker. Calculations were performed in the photon energy range of 30–1836 keV . Simulated detection efficiencies obtained from both Monte-Carlo software were found to be in a good agreement (typically <5%) with experimental results for the considered source ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, the detectors employed by Ješkovský et al (2019), and Khan et al (2018), tend to have a behavior that increases the FEPE until a zone near to 100 keV.After this range of energy in those type of detectors, the FEPE curve tends to decrease with energy(Ješkovský et al, 2019;Khan et al, 2018). On the other hand, the detectors employed byAviv & Elia (2020) the FEPE decreases while energy increases(Aviv & Elia, 2020). Analysis of figure3shows our values are different from Ješkovský et al (2019), and Khan et al (2018) but have similarities with Aviv & Elia.…”
contrasting
confidence: 61%
“…On one hand, the detectors employed by Ješkovský et al (2019), and Khan et al (2018), tend to have a behavior that increases the FEPE until a zone near to 100 keV.After this range of energy in those type of detectors, the FEPE curve tends to decrease with energy(Ješkovský et al, 2019;Khan et al, 2018). On the other hand, the detectors employed byAviv & Elia (2020) the FEPE decreases while energy increases(Aviv & Elia, 2020). Analysis of figure3shows our values are different from Ješkovský et al (2019), and Khan et al (2018) but have similarities with Aviv & Elia.…”
contrasting
confidence: 61%
“…There is extensive bibliography on the characterization of various types of spectrometers built around HPGe detectors in terms of the absolute efficiency, linear response and energy resolution (see e.g., [4][5][6][7][8]). Complementing experimental studies, the fast increase of high-computing power has facilitated detailed simulations of detector crystals and complex experimental setups, providing important knowledge on features which traditional experimental approaches can not access in a straightforward manner [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, fulfill the 5% to 10% criteria according to the filling height of the cobalt-60 (60Co) volume source [8]. Aviv and Elia [10] used GEANT4 and FLUKA to correct the FEP difference of a broad-energy HPGe detector within 5% of the experimental value for point-like, filter paper, and water beaker-type sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%